Edited by mic of orion, 19 November 2011 - 06:13 PM.
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
These ads will disappear if you register on the forum
Occupy Wall Street Protesters
#561
Posted 19 November 2011 - 01:18 PM
They that can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.
#562
Posted 19 November 2011 - 04:16 PM
I'd like to hear the right-wingers on here try to justify this. They can't.
#563
Posted 20 November 2011 - 01:08 AM
There's an investigation now:
http://www.cnn.com/2...pray/index.html
#564
Posted 20 November 2011 - 07:40 AM
http://thenewcivilri...50#.TsiuPfKa--V
#565
Posted 20 November 2011 - 07:40 AM
A silent walk of shame -
#566
Posted 20 November 2011 - 09:48 AM
"As the Egyptian people shape their future, the United States continues to believe that the rights of minorities -- including Copts -- must be respected, and that all people have the universal rights of peaceful protest and religious freedom." - Barack Obama
The people of Egypt have rights that are universal.
That includes the right to peaceful assembly and association,the right to free speech, and the ability to determine their own destiny. These are human rights. And the United States will stand up for them everywhere,"

Time to say something else about the right to peaceful assembly, Barack.
#567
Posted 20 November 2011 - 11:04 AM
- deleted by wjfox -
Fascist sadist if I ever saw one,
They that can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.
#568
Posted 20 November 2011 - 11:18 AM
They that can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.
#569
Posted 20 November 2011 - 11:20 AM
#570
Posted 20 November 2011 - 11:50 AM
How is this different to the repressive regimes in China, etc?
---
Demonstrations to be banned during Olympics
Ministers ponder tough new powers to prevent Occupy-style protests interfering with Games
http://www.independe....s-6265121.html
#571
Posted 20 November 2011 - 03:01 PM
I also think the video is being taken out of context by the media and internet. It doesn't show the before and after.
It's actually a very peaceful incident taken widely out of context by everyone. Just like you say, each crime. rape, and act of violence does not represent the OWS as a whole, this does not represent the police as a whole. Hell, the guy was paid (salary) with private union University funds!
We should be analyzing each individual crime that OWS and the Police have committed in these protests, I think you'll find that OWS has broken the law more times than police. Police have been relatively respectful in the two month long process. But as you say, the protesters like to question authority. It's more like they don't listen at all! They don't even try to open a dialogue with the police. Try to negotiate with them.
However, this is interfering with the protesters rights to protest peacefully and from the videos they indeed were. There's always two sides to the coin.
http://www.businessi...ay-2011-11?op=1
Edited by jjf3, 20 November 2011 - 03:37 PM.
#572
Posted 20 November 2011 - 04:22 PM
It's Kent State all over again, only this time with a million views within 48 hours of the event.
Heh... the people were warned by the police to leave.... are you kidding? What harm were they causing by being there? Was it worth spraying unarmed, peaceful protesters at point blank range?
The difference between the police and OWS when there are incidents like this is that the police defend their officers who attack peaceful protesters, and OWS condemns each act of defacement or violence against anyone. These are peaceful protests, and they are being cracked down upon because they are striking a nerve. They are shining a glaring light on institutionalized injustice, and the institution is doing everything they can to make them go away. And, despite a vastly superior force and brutal terror tactics, the institution is not succeeding. Each attack upon the protesters multiplies their numbers, and each attack is being documented, since everyone these days has devices that can instantly record and bring these stories to the masses.
Spring is coming early this year.
I hope someday you'll join us, and the world will be as one
#573
Posted 20 November 2011 - 05:15 PM
I have said that it was a step in the wrong direction, and yes the event will cause more people to become sympathetic with the movement. The police shouldn't have done that and I agree. But the protesters should have asked why they have to leave. Not just sit there like ignorant unlawful idiots. IDK about you but when a police officer tells me I am doing something wrong I tend to listen to listen them. I have every right to question why however.
Edited by jjf3, 20 November 2011 - 05:15 PM.
#574
Posted 20 November 2011 - 05:25 PM
A term that YOU should research is civil disobedience.
http://en.wikipedia....il_disobedience
There will always be people who feel like its always best to shut up and take the dick of authority between your legs, but no thanks. Don't sell me or them that horseshit.
Edited by KingstonDon, 20 November 2011 - 05:25 PM.
#575
Posted 20 November 2011 - 05:35 PM
So when a police officer tells you, you got a ticket for speeding, do you continue do speed? Or even worse, speed away from them?
If a police tells you, you are blocking a doorway to an entrance of a building do you move? Or refuse to move? I would think most people would Peacefully get out of the way, and obey the law! They could have always moved ten feet away from the cops... Then, cops couldn't have done anything about it.
Protesters should have asked police why they had to leave. That is my stand right now. If the police explained the law in a bias way towards the protesters then we might have had a clearer view of his reasoning behind using pepper spray.
Protesting =/= above the law.
Illegal enforcement of laws =/= above the law.
Edited by jjf3, 20 November 2011 - 05:52 PM.
#576
Posted 20 November 2011 - 08:08 PM
#577
Posted 20 November 2011 - 10:04 PM
http://upwithchrisha...ll-street-video
Edited by mic of orion, 20 November 2011 - 10:04 PM.
They that can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.
#578
Posted 21 November 2011 - 01:07 AM
#579
Posted 21 November 2011 - 10:21 AM
#580
Posted 22 November 2011 - 10:38 AM
really getting annoyed now. this forum's need video embedding feature/icon asp.
Edited by mic of orion, 22 November 2011 - 11:19 AM.
They that can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Sign In
Create Account

Back to top








