Jump to content

Welcome to FutureTimeline.forum
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!

These ads will disappear if you register on the forum

Photo

2020 US Presidential Election


  • Please log in to reply
114 replies to this topic

#101
wjfox

wjfox

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,966 posts
  • LocationLondon


  • Time_Traveller likes this

#102
Cody930

Cody930

    An Apple Pie from Scratch

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,509 posts
  • LocationNew Jersey, US

The DNC apparently tried passing a resolution that would require Sanders and King (the other independent in the senate) to be be democrats in 2018. It was an interesting move..almost seems like they're trying to gear up (or are just afraid and want the D in front of his name) for Bernie being the front-runner in 2020.


"Since we first emerged, a few million years ago in East Africa, we have meandered our way around the planet. There are now people on every continent and the remotest islands, from pole to pole, from Mount Everest to the Dead Sea, on the ocean bottoms and even, occasionally, in residence 200 miles up - humans, like the gods of old, living in the sky."


#103
caltrek

caltrek

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,216 posts

Mark Cuban would run for president as a Republican in 2020

 

https://www.msn.com/...ID=ansmsnnews11

 

Introduction:

 

Billionaire Mark Cuban thinks he could be the next President Trump, and says he could use the commander-in-chief's own party to do it.

 

The Dallas Mavericks owner and reality show personality told Fox News Sunday night that if he runs for the White House he would do so as a Republican.

"I think there's a place for somebody who's socially a centrist but I'm very fiscally conservative," he said.

 

Cuban, who has evolved into a frequent critic of his fellow billionaire now in Washington, confirmed that he is looking into the idea of going into politics, and said that the chance he does so is about a four out of 10.

 

"We're going into an era where people want someone who comes up with solutions. I think we're going into a time where you need somebody who can connect to people and relate to people at a base level and appreciate what they're going through - and I think I qualify on each of those."


The principles of justice define an appropriate path between dogmatism and intolerance on the one side, and a reductionism which regards religion and morality as mere preferences on the other.   - John Rawls


#104
Jakob

Jakob

    Fenny-Eyed Slubber-Yuck

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,236 posts
  • LocationIn the Basket of Deplorables

Wait, he's a republican now?


Click 'show' to see quotes from great luminaries.

Spoiler

#105
Alislaws

Alislaws

    Democratic Socialist Materialist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 722 posts
  • LocationLondon

Wait, he's a republican now?

I guess he's a republican in the same way Trump was a republican before he got involved in politics, i.e. he may have funded some republicans (and probably some democrats) at some point, but has mostly not followed any specific party line. Don't know much about him though. 

 

I would imagine most billionaires who enter politics would do so as Republicans, as that's the party that is more likely to let them lower taxes on themselves and their friends. 



#106
Raklian

Raklian

    An Immortal In The Making

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,512 posts
  • LocationRaleigh, NC

 

Wait, he's a republican now?

I guess he's a republican in the same way Trump was a republican before he got involved in politics

 

 

Here's an interesting fact about a younger Trump.

 

Trump was a registered Democrat from August 2001 through September 2009.


What are you without the sum of your parts?

#107
Sciencerocks

Sciencerocks

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,742 posts

 

 

Wait, he's a republican now?

I guess he's a republican in the same way Trump was a republican before he got involved in politics

 

 

Here's an interesting fact about a younger Trump.

 

Trump was a registered Democrat from August 2001 through September 2009.

 

 

And yet he becomes the leader of the prudes. People do weird shit.


To follow my work on tropical cyclones


#108
Yuli Ban

Yuli Ban

    Nadsat Brat

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,143 posts
  • LocationAnur Margidda

Funny how he was a Democrat during the 8 years a Republican was president and then a Republican during the 8 years a Democrat was president.


Nobody's gonna take my drone, I'm gonna fly miles far too high!
Nobody gonna beat my drone, it's gonna shoot into the sky!

#109
Raklian

Raklian

    An Immortal In The Making

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,512 posts
  • LocationRaleigh, NC

Funny how he was a Democrat during the 8 years a Republican was president and then a Republican during the 8 years a Democrat was president.

 

Yeah, it's as if he is compelled to assume the role of being the opposite or antagonist regardless of the overarching issue at hand - I guess it's part of his persona. No wonder he's been clashing with anybody he encounters.

 

There's actually a psychology-profiling diagnosis for this type of personality - High Conflict Personality.


What are you without the sum of your parts?

#110
caltrek

caltrek

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,216 posts

I guess Sessions has been just too busy on issues such as ending local control of marijuana use and making sure needed farm workers get deported to give a damn about protecting the integrity of our electoral system.

 

Sessions Admits He Has “Not Followed Through” on Pledge to Protect Elections From Russian Meddling

 

http://www.motherjon...ssian-meddling/

 

Introduction:

 

 

 

(Mother Jones) Attorney General Jeff Sessions said Tuesday that he has “not followed through” on a vow to review how the United States can protect its elections from future Russian interference. In a congressional hearing in which he was repeatedly pressed on his claims that he did not recall details of his own contacts with Russian officials and those of other Trump campaign surrogates, Sessions’ most striking lapse may have been his inability to identify any specific actions he and the Justice Department have taken to stop the Russians or other states from meddling in elections next year and beyond.

 

More than three hours into Sessions’ testimony before the House Judiciary Committee, Rep. Brad Schneider (D-Ill.) pointed out that Sessions had told Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.) at an October 18 Senate hearing that protecting election integrity required “a real review” of how the department can help police election infrastructure. But, Schneider noted, Sessions had said earlier in Tuesday’s hearing that no review is taking place. “Specifically what steps have you taken to protect our elections next year?” Schneider asked.

 

“You raise a good point,” Sessions said. “I have not followed through to see where we are on that, and I will personally take action to do so.” Sessions said that the department is busy on various agenda items, but he added, “This one is important. And I acknowledge that. But I should be able to give you better information today than I am.”

 

Sessions’ response will do nothing to alleviate widespread concerns that the Trump administration does not take Russian efforts to interfere in US elections seriously. President Donald Trump has refused to accept to the US intelligence agencies’ consensus view that the Russians interfered in the 2016 election to help him prevail over Hillary Clinton. This weekend, during a trip to Asia, Trump told reporters he believed Russian President Vladimir Putin’s denials that Russia meddled in the election, while disputing the US intelligence findings. (Trump later sought to clarify his remarks, saying on Saturday, “I’m with our agencies, especially as currently constituted with their leadership.”)


  • rennerpetey likes this

The principles of justice define an appropriate path between dogmatism and intolerance on the one side, and a reductionism which regards religion and morality as mere preferences on the other.   - John Rawls


#111
Zaphod

Zaphod

    Esteemed Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 611 posts
  • LocationUK

49dmmalysbR1JBBqj2zX4fQE3LFJ1sTCVyAt4XPW


  • Cody930, Yuli Ban and Mike the average like this

#112
Yuli Ban

Yuli Ban

    Nadsat Brat

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,143 posts
  • LocationAnur Margidda

2024: The Phantom Menace

 

2028: Attack of the Clones

 

2036: Revenge of the Sith

 

World War III!

 

204X: The Force Awakens

 

205X: The Last Jedi


Nobody's gonna take my drone, I'm gonna fly miles far too high!
Nobody gonna beat my drone, it's gonna shoot into the sky!

#113
Ewolf20

Ewolf20

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 175 posts
  • LocationColumbia,sc

2024: The Phantom Menace

 

2028: Attack of the Clones

 

2036: Revenge of the Sith

 

World War III!

 

204X: The Force Awakens

 

205X: The Last Jedi

so now can i see the effects of nuclear bombardment?



#114
BasilBerylium

BasilBerylium

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 551 posts
  • LocationArgentina

so now can i see the effects of nuclear bombardment?

Yes, just not on a global scale*.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*(in case only a civil war happens)



#115
Ewolf20

Ewolf20

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 175 posts
  • LocationColumbia,sc

 

so now can i see the effects of nuclear bombardment?

Yes, just not on a global scale*.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*(in case only a civil war happens)

 

so just in the united states? which leads to a reduction of the human population/? and since more people are opting out of child care, it's going to be a slow road to recovery.






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users