Jump to content

Welcome to FutureTimeline.forum
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!

These ads will disappear if you register on the forum

Photo

Destroying Earth


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1
wjfox

wjfox

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,264 posts
  • LocationLondon


  • Yuli Ban likes this

#2
caltrek

caltrek

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,801 posts

I know that the article below is not necessarily what Wjfox had in mind when he started this thread.  Still, I think it fits.

 

 

Why this online simulator lets you nuke your backyard

 

https://www.theverge...map-war-imagery

 

Introduction:

 

(The Verge) If a nuclear bomb went off on San Francisco, almost the entire tip of the peninsula would disappear under the fireball, shockwave, radiation, and catastrophic heat spreading from the blast. More than 100,000 people would die, and nearly 230,000 people would be injured. That’s according to a new online interactive simulator that lets you drop a virtual nuke anywhere in the world.

 

Created by a Wisconsin-based educational nonprofit called the Outrider Foundation, the blast simulator is an effort to teach the public about the dangers of nuclear weapons. It’s surprisingly beautiful for an educational tool about destruction — “almost too beautiful for its own good,” writes Matt Novak at Gizmodo. But the Outrider simulator is more than just a pretty interface; it’s an effective reminder that these weapons could wipe entire cities filled with people off the face of the Earth.

 

“There’s a degree to which they’re luring you in with these really pretty graphics,” says nuclear anthropologist Martin Pfeiffer, a PhD candidate at the University of New Mexico. “Then you click on it and you realize, ‘Holy fuck, that’s 50,000 people [gone] in a heartbeat.’”

 

That tally is key for preventing what Pfeiffer calls “aesthetic nuke porn,” imagery that showcases the raw power of bombs bursting in the air without showing any of the consequences. Nukes are designed to kill people — and they have. That’s why Tara Drozdenko, the Outrider Foundation’s managing director of nuclear policy and non-proliferation, tried to avoid overusing images of mushroom clouds. “They’ve been used in the past to stir up nationalist sentiment and to give you a sense of pride in the accomplishment of having nuclear weapons,” she says.

 

Pfeiffer agrees: striking footage of nuclear tests can make these weapons and nuclear policy feel abstract and inaccessible. “The sublime, the majesty, the almost religious awe and terror of nuclear weapons — that places it for many of us outside the idea that we can do anything about it,” he says.


The principles of justice define an appropriate path between dogmatism and intolerance on the one side, and a reductionism which regards religion and morality as mere preferences on the other.   - John Rawls


#3
BasilBerylium

BasilBerylium

    Terminally Lazy

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 714 posts
  • LocationArgentina

The classic one: https://nuclearsecrecy.com/nukemap/


Spoiler

#4
_SputnicK_

_SputnicK_

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 82 posts
  • LocationUSA

ConfusedNearIggypops-size_restricted.gif

"We will crush the rebellion with one swift stroke!" ---Wilhuff Tarkin

I'm sorry I couldn't help myself.


"We are attempting to survive our time so we may live into yours." -Jimmy Carter, 1977

"In my mind and in my car, we can't rewind we've gone too far. Pictures came and broke your heart, put down the blame on VCR." -The Buggles, 1980





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users