Jump to content

Welcome to FutureTimeline.forum
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!

These ads will disappear if you register on the forum

Photo

The Economist's predictions for 2050


  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1
wjfox

wjfox

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,749 posts
  • LocationLondon
The Economist's predictions for 2050

23 March 2012 Last updated at 15:37

In this week's Meet the Author, Nick Higham meets the Economist's Executive Editor, Daniel Franklin, who has published a book of essays about the future of the world called Megachange - The World in 2050.

The book explores the possibility of life on other planets, climate change and the role of China and India in the next four decades.

http://www.bbc.co.uk...t-arts-17465251

#2
Logically Irrational

Logically Irrational

    For Lack of a Better Name

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,442 posts
  • LocationHoover Dam
Looks like you hit the nail on the head with China transitioning to a democracy.
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn!

#3
Nick1984

Nick1984

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 432 posts
I think they need to make sure China wouldn't split apart before they introduce democracy.

They need to bring wealth to the inland rural areas or there'd be an uprising again. Right now the Communist party is the best thing for China.

Edited by Nick1984, 25 March 2012 - 07:59 PM.


#4
Logically Irrational

Logically Irrational

    For Lack of a Better Name

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,442 posts
  • LocationHoover Dam

I think they need to make sure China wouldn't split apart before they introduce democracy.

They need to bring wealth to the inland rural areas or there'd be an uprising again. Right now the Communist party is the best thing for China.


Agreed. I just wonder what will happen to the inland population as we move into the century. There's supposed to be a lot of droughts in the west.
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn!

#5
SG-1

SG-1

    Todd the Wraith

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,887 posts
  • LocationArkansas, USA
The one thing I didn't agree with is him saying we will find life on other planets by 2050.

It is possible we would find microorganisms, but even that is unlikely by then if there aren't any present in our solar system. Maybe we will find the remains of some sort of life on Mars by then, but I can't imagine us pinning a date on when we will stumble upon some life out there - intelligent or not.

We already have found some planets that could support life though if I'm not mistaken, the Gliese 581 system.
"I see nothing in space as promising as the view from a Ferris wheel.” -E.B. White
"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough." -Albert Einstein

#6
RCM88x

RCM88x

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 34 posts
Interesting that he says that we'll know which planets have life in 2050, I personally don't see this happening. The book seems interesting though, I may look into reading it.

#7
Craven

Craven

    Elephant in the forest

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,452 posts
  • LocationPoland, Cracow
It's 2012 and we're already coming up with technology and ways of finding life on exoplanets. I don't see how we couldn't do that in 2050.
"I walk alone and do no evil, having only a few wishes, just like an elephant in the forest."

"Laugh, and the world laughs with you. Weep, and you weep alone."

#8
GNR Rvolution

GNR Rvolution

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 528 posts
  • LocationLondon
Yeah, I don't think he meant anything more than finding evidence that life may exist on this planet or that, from remote observation and analysis. I'm guessing from analysis of atmospheric gas content, spectral analysis (seeing if anyone left the lights on) EM transmissions, etc. I'm not expecting an interview with them on TV or anything...
All right, brain. You don't like me and I don't like you, but let's just do this and I can get back to killing you with beer.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users