Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
These ads will disappear if you register on the forum
#1
Posted 24 September 2011 - 05:37 AM
#2
Posted 24 September 2011 - 10:02 AM
Foreign creditors aren't going to stop. We're a AAA (except for the AA+ give to us by S&D, a decision based solely on the Republicans' opposition to relinquish the Bush tax cuts) nation. China is getting rich off of us. They're not going to stop. It's profitable and it will remain profitable for a long time.
2012 my asshole. Get a reliable source.
#3
Posted 24 September 2011 - 04:51 PM
"Our role is to call the risks objectively, with transparency, and that's what we try to do to fulfill our role and that's what our job is for the benefit of investors."
I don't think it really had much to do with the Bush Tax Cuts otherwise Mr. Obama would have seen them expire, not re-sign them into law!!!!! There is something called political power, that Obama might have forgotten that he has. He didn't have to bring them back. There are much more things that we need to worry about than the Tax Cuts. Like actually paying off our debt, which wealth distribution will not accomplish.
#4
Posted 24 September 2011 - 09:39 PM
Are you hiding under a rock? First of all, I'm not an Obama supporter.Haha its funny how obama supporters will follow him and do w/e the hell he says without even looking at the facts or how bad a state our economy is. I could definitely see this happening. He will definitely not explain it as clear as this video does. 2012 is a bit of a stretch i'll agree, but 2015? If obama is re-elected and we stay on this course, than I don't see why not. S&P clearly stated that there was no political agenda in it's decision to downgrade us. And I would believe them, over MSNBC or FOX News.
"Our role is to call the risks objectively, with transparency, and that's what we try to do to fulfill our role and that's what our job is for the benefit of investors."
I don't think it really had much to do with the Bush Tax Cuts otherwise Mr. Obama would have seen them expire, not re-sign them into law!!!!! There is something called political power, that Obama might have forgotten that he has. He didn't have to bring them back. There are much more things that we need to worry about than the Tax Cuts. Like actually paying off our debt, which wealth distribution will not accomplish.
In the freaking report that Standard and Poor gave stating their reasons for the downgrade, it was the debt ceiling crisis and lack of (what they perceive) new revenue.
Obama has been wanting to get rid of the Bush tax cuts for a long time. A long time. Haven't you heard him saying "pay their share"? The "Buffett tax"? He renewed them in December 2010 because the lame duck Republicans threatened to deadlock which would mean the federal government would have to default on unemployment checks. A compromise that Obama left off until 2012 where he could use it as a political ploy. A good majority of Americans want to see tax hikes on the rich so he's going to get a lot of votes just for that.Compared with previous projections, our revised base case scenario now assumes that the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts, due to expire by the end of 2012, remain in place. We have changed our assumption on this because the majority of Republicans in Congress continue to resist any measure that would raise
revenues, a position we believe Congress reinforced by passing the act.
#5
Posted 25 September 2011 - 06:50 PM
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Obama, Economy, America, FAIL!
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Sign In
Create Account

Back to top







