Jump to content

Welcome to FutureTimeline.forum
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Photo

Canada Watch Thread

Canada Canadian Canadians North America America tar sands oil

  • Please log in to reply
54 replies to this topic

#41
Outlook

Outlook

    Arab Muslim

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,189 posts
  • LocationBarbary Lands
I wont vote for Trudeau for the brownface but I'll vote because I can't pay my tuition.
  • Erowind likes this

Outlook's secret song of the ~week: https://youtu.be/DGe_Sluth3A


#42
Erowind

Erowind

    Anarchist without an adjective

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,099 posts

NDP and Bloc Quebecois are the only valid options to me. I'd say green. But Canadian greens smell of green liberalism to me or in other words, virtue signaling while still killing the planet. I understand that NDP is leaning more and more liberal nowadays and has fallen for trying to be an alternative to the Liberal Party while just being the Liberal party, but there's a chance they've learned from their mistakes and will swing farther left like they used to due to insurgent elements within their own party. If they don't again this time around then screw them too, mandatory French lessons and Quebecois supremacy for all the canucks ;)



#43
Outlook

Outlook

    Arab Muslim

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,189 posts
  • LocationBarbary Lands
Bloc Quebecois being left-wing is a bad guise. Quebec nationalism is very intertwined with anti-Arabism and Islamophobia, and I'd switch them out for the Green party. The Green Party still is pretty leftist, but their issue is that they place environmentalist and pacifist concerns center to and seperate from structural and economic concerns, which are pretty intertwined.

I can only link an article right now, since I'm pretty brain dead from insomnia and a shitty mattress, but for something against Quebec nationalism.

https://www.google.c...a/amp/1.3960181

It's for that reason, as well as other reasons like my bias against French nationalists in general, that I don't support Quebec nationalism.

Outlook's secret song of the ~week: https://youtu.be/DGe_Sluth3A


#44
Maximus

Maximus

    Spaceman

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,814 posts
  • LocationCanada

EXCLUSIVE: Video shows Trudeau in blackface in 3rd instance of racist makeup

 

The video, obtained exclusively by Global News, shows Trudeau covered in what appears to be dark makeup and raising his hands in the air while laughing, sticking his tongue out and making faces. He’s wearing a white T-shirt, and his jeans are ripped at the knees. It appears as though his arms and legs are covered in makeup as well.

 
It does not appear the video was shot at the same time and place as the other photos of Trudeau in racist makeup.
 
Global News obtained the video from a source within the Conservative Party of Canada and independently verified it to be true with Liberal party officials before reporting on it.

If this were any other politician, they would have been buried by now. One picture? Passable as a mistake by some. Three known instances of racist makeup? Are we talking about Trudeau here, or the leader of the KKK? Maybe it's a sign that cancel culture has died down a bit. In any case, I can't see Trudeau winning the next election, the Liberals are gonna lose big from this. With a split left, it looks like we're gonna have a Conservative government.


  • wjfox, Yuli Ban, Outlook and 1 other like this

#45
Outlook

Outlook

    Arab Muslim

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,189 posts
  • LocationBarbary Lands

 

The source did not shoot the video, but Global News subsequently reached the person believed to have shot the video. That person would neither confirm or deny that it was Trudeau in the video, nor would they confirm the time and place of the video.

 

What a shitshow the information age is.

 

EDIT: I think the reason it isn't canceling him is that he's the leader of the liberal party, and his history of public liberal rhetoric solidified his new political character. While cancel culture and outrage often doesn't seem irrational, people can understand that a racist thing someone did 18 years ago when they were young is different than someone tweeting racist comments 2 years ago, or pulling out rhetoric someone held on a public stage without going through a process of public apology or acknowledgement that they changed their opinion.

 

It'll out him as being a big hypocrite, and from now on anytime he tries to feel outraged over social justice issues his opponent will just bring up Prince Trudeau Ababwa.


  • Maximus and Erowind like this

Outlook's secret song of the ~week: https://youtu.be/DGe_Sluth3A


#46
Erowind

Erowind

    Anarchist without an adjective

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,099 posts

Bloc Quebecois being left-wing is a bad guise. 

 

Darn. That's disappointing. The articles I've seen have ignorantly painted them as opposition to the neoliberals without regard for other parts of their platform it seems. Nationalism is this tenuous thing. Sometimes when I see a nationalist party it's not actually nationalist and is just using the word for optics purposes like the SNP in Scotland. Other times it's like the AFD in Germany and the party is full of a bunch of closet Nazis. I was clearly blind in the case of Bloc Quebecois. Not saying that BQ is as bad as the AFD yet, but they're worse than I thought they were. 


  • Outlook likes this

#47
Maximus

Maximus

    Spaceman

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,814 posts
  • LocationCanada

To our Canadian members: what issue(s) are the most important for you this upcoming election?

 

To me it's environmental policy, affordable housing, and innovation.

 

The main issue that has affected me day-to-day is the Trans-Mountain pipeline. I voted Liberal in 2015, my riding went Liberal, and after all the environmental promises made on environment last time around, they decided to ram through the Trans-Mountain pipeline expansion literally right outside my doorstep. Every day for the past few years, I've had to put up with road closures popping up on every street around my neighbourhood because of this pipeline. To be fair though, my MP did oppose the expansion up until it was rammed through by Trudeau, and even joined protestors. I do appreciate that the Liberals banned tanker traffic off the northern coast of BC though. NDP seems to have a much more ambitious environmental policy, although it's true that you only really see a party's real platform once they get into power. I'm encouraged to see Conservatives finally acknowledge climate change is real and man-made, and I was intrigued to hear about their idea to scrap the carbon tax in favour of making emitters pay into a green energy innovation fund. However, let's be real; they're Conservatives and they'll still lick the boots of big oil. 

 

I also have to consider each party's chances of winning. I do believe in such thing as a wasted vote. I don't buy the idea that you should vote for whoever represents your views the best. You should vote for who represents your ideas the best, and has a reasonable chance of winning. If it's a tie up between all parties, then sure you should vote with your heart only. But if your party is standing at 1.5% of the popular vote, and the front-runners are tied at 50-50, it would be much more strategic to vote for the front-runner who better aligns with your views. Conservatives, Greens, and the PPC have no chance in my riding. So for me, this strategically leaves me with two options; Liberal or NDP. My vote can either take away a seat from the Liberals, and maybe give the Conservatives a better chance of winning, and give the NDP (a party with very little chances of having a national impact) an extra seat. Or I can help the Liberals extend their lead over Conservatives. I think out of those two choices, Liberals would be the safer choice.


  • Erowind likes this

#48
Outlook

Outlook

    Arab Muslim

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,189 posts
  • LocationBarbary Lands
^Yes, that's how I'm voting too. My riding is on a head between Liberals and Conservatives so my vote is already picked for me.

Outlook's secret song of the ~week: https://youtu.be/DGe_Sluth3A


#49
Maximus

Maximus

    Spaceman

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,814 posts
  • LocationCanada

What's your impression of the PPC, Outlook? I think it's a party destined to fail. Populism made some waves in Europe around 2016, but I think they would be lucky to even get a single seat in Canada today. The only way I can see them ever getting a bigger following is if the oil sands fail, or are shut down, and most of Alberta becomes unemployed. 



#50
Outlook

Outlook

    Arab Muslim

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,189 posts
  • LocationBarbary Lands

I haven't thought of them that much since they're barely here in Southern Ontario. I'm inclined to agree though, populism can't really thrive in Canada on a federal level. Canadians aren't as frustrated as Americans are with regards to their federal leadership. It helps that Canada's fairly insulated from nation-wide populist-sparking issues like a migration crisis and just in general our issues are fairly mundane.


Outlook's secret song of the ~week: https://youtu.be/DGe_Sluth3A


#51
Outlook

Outlook

    Arab Muslim

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,189 posts
  • LocationBarbary Lands
Voted for the Liberal party today, but joining the communist party tomorrow.
  • Erowind likes this

Outlook's secret song of the ~week: https://youtu.be/DGe_Sluth3A


#52
Maximus

Maximus

    Spaceman

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,814 posts
  • LocationCanada

Voted NDP, the Liberals betrayed us, and my riding especially on climate change. Also, wanted to take away a seat from the Liberals so they wouldn't reach a majority again. I think a minority Liberal government is the best case, as they will be forced to work with the other parties more, and the other parties together can check Trudeau's corrupt tendencies this time around. Not to mention the promise about electoral reform in 2015. Thanks to this, we still have an electoral system that gives Bloc Quebecois 32 seats with 8.8% of the vote, and the Greens only 4 seats with 6.2% of the vote. Trudeau had 4 years with a majority to change this, and he did nothing. A continued attempt to neglect and muzzle Western Canada.


  • wjfox and Erowind like this

#53
Outlook

Outlook

    Arab Muslim

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,189 posts
  • LocationBarbary Lands

Yea, I can't help but feel sorry for the green party and NDP. PPC didn't get a single seat though, so there's that. Our riding is still counting ballots, and it's extremely tight but the liberal candidate is in the lead. I campaigned and met the guy a while back, he gave me a ride when we went canvassing, so here's hoping I can brag about having a connect with the house of commons. "Yea, my MP gave me a ride home once"


Outlook's secret song of the ~week: https://youtu.be/DGe_Sluth3A


#54
caltrek

caltrek

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,064 posts

Climate Change Deniers Become Extinct in Canadian Election

 

https://www.commondr...nadian-election

 

Introduction:

 

(Common Dreams) Canada’s centrist Liberal Party won re-election Monday, but as a minority government, which means it will need the support of either the more left New Democratic Party or the nationalist Bloc Quebecois to survive.

 

But perhaps more interesting is that the only political party that denies climate change is caused by humans won less than two percent of the vote despite its high profile leader, former Conservative cabinet minister Maxime Bernier. The anti-immigrant, right wing People’s Party of Canada, formed by a self-described libertarian after he narrowly lost the vote to become Conservative leader, failed to elect even a single member of Parliament.

 

The four parties that do offer climate action plans (of varying seriousness) collected almost 65 percent of the vote.

 

The Conservative Party, which acknowledges that climate change is real, but offered only magical undefined “technological solutions” as a solution, won 34 percent of the popular vote and 122 seats of the 338 total. The party’s vote is heavily concentrated in rural areas plus Alberta and Saskatchewan, two provinces dependent on the oil and gas industries.

 

Justin Trudeau’s Liberal Party, which won a majority of seats in the 2015 election with almost 40 percent of the vote on a platform of progressive promises, including reducing Canada’s carbon footprint and reforming the country’s first-past-the-post electoral system, but fulfilled neither, fell to 33 percent of the popular vote and won 155 seats, based on almost complete results. The drop in Liberal support was generally attributed to the severely diminished popularity of the prime minister (one “corruption” scandal and the bombshell discovery of photos showing Trudeau in blackface) as well as buying a pipeline due to be expanded from Alberta to the Pacific coast, which undermined his credibility as an environmentalist.


  • Jessica likes this

The principles of justice define an appropriate path between dogmatism and intolerance on the one side, and a reductionism which regards religion and morality as mere preferences on the other.   - John Rawls


#55
caltrek

caltrek

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,064 posts

Canadian kids sue government over climate change
 

https://www.nature.c...586-019-03253-5

 

Introduction:

 

(Nature) A group of children and young adults filed a lawsuit on 25 October alleging that the Canadian government has violated their constitutional rights by promoting and enabling fossil-fuel development in spite of acknowledged risks from global warming.

 

Fifteen people aged between 10 and 19 filed the lawsuit in federal court, arguing that climate change will impinge on their right to “life, liberty and security”. The lawsuit also argues that climate change will interfere with basic equality rights, given that the most severe effects of climate change will be borne by future generations.

 

“Basically, what we’re arguing is that the courts must hold this generation to account for harms that are being done to the next,” says Chris Tollefson, co-counsel for the plaintiffs and a specialist in environmental law at the University of Victoria in Canada.

 

Ira Reinhart-Smith, a 15-year-old plaintiff from Caledonia, Canada, says that he got involved with climate activism — including the Fridays for Future school-strike movement — last year. “This lawsuit is helping me express my anger and my fear,” he says. “My generation and generations to come are going to be exposed to things that the world has never been exposed to before.”

 

The lawsuit is the latest in a series of legal challenges aiming to force governments around the world to act on climate change. It comes just days after an election in which Canadian prime minister Justin Trudeau — whose administration has acted more aggressively on climate change than his predecessors — eked out a win, although his Liberal Party lost its majority in parliament.


The principles of justice define an appropriate path between dogmatism and intolerance on the one side, and a reductionism which regards religion and morality as mere preferences on the other.   - John Rawls






Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Canada, Canadian, Canadians, North America, America, tar sands, oil

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users