Jump to content

Welcome to FutureTimeline.forum
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!

These ads will disappear if you register on the forum

Photo

The comments at Disinfo.com got so toxic that even THEY pulled the plug -- part of a trend of media deleting their comments sections.


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1
starspawn0

starspawn0

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 505 posts
http://disinfo.com/2...-good-riddance/

The kinds of comment one would see on the site:

* Alt-right, anti-Jewish conspiracies. Lots of "Jews in control" posts.

* Raging climate denialism -- almost 100% of the comments on climate change articles were denialist. All the old regulars would show up, and say how corrupt scientists are; how it's all a big hoax perpetrated by "the elites".

* Total cynicism about politics -- a lot of it directed at Democrats. Hillary was a favorite target. Many of the people who wrote these things are not right or far-left, but are just hipsters who are so cynical that they attack, because, "why not?" Then there are the former 9/11 Truthers, who once believed in something (even though it was wrong), who now are basically just alt-righters.

* Racism and sexism, along with adamant denials that they are racist or sexist -- that it's all just SJWs causing trouble.

* More recently: total cynicism about the Russia collusion investigation. It's just power-hungry Democrats trying to take Trump down.

* Anything "official" is suspect. For example, if some U.N. organization reports findings about chemical weapons being used in Syria by Assad, it was immediately called into question, and treated as false without question. WHy? Because it was "official" -- came from "official sources".


All this bilge was blasted out on a daily basis, for years.


Technology Review also deleted their comments section a year or two ago. A lot of the problem seemed to have to do with climate denialism -- anytime a climate change article was posted, a group of people would show up and attack, basically calling the journalists naive and stupid. Jason Pontin, who at the time was the Editor in Chief, got so upset over one troll, he even decided to track him down, and wrote a piece about him:

https://www.technolo...e-and-my-troll/




I have a troll. Writing as @zdzisiekm, or “Gus,” or under other names, he has commented on stories on TechnologyReview.com 6,386 times and counting as of April 2017. As trolls go, he is unfailingly polite, and he doesn’t violate our site’s terms of service. Instead, he is reflexively, tendentiously wrong about a single topic, again and again. Gus is angry about our reporting on global warming and renewable energy technologies. His objections are notionally scientific, but they have a strongly ideological flavor.

Four years ago, commenting on “Climate Change: The Moral Choices,” @zdzisiekm characteristically wrote, “Having studied the relevant science literature quite extensively and in depth—I read hundreds of papers on the subject—there is no real ‘climate change threat.’ It’s all trumped up—the actual published peer-reviewed science is clear on this … This is because in some countries [economists] are so keen to switch the economy away from fossil fuels, they’ll go with any lie …”

....

I know who Gus is, because I tracked him down. We ask readers to provide some personal information before they can comment, and he wasn’t hard to find. My troll is a sixtysomething technical advisor to the IT department of a large public university in the Midwest. He has not one but two PhDs—in electrical engineering and physics. He writes good research about computer architecture and bad poetry about cats. (I agreed not to use @zdzisiekm’s real name for this story. “I know you know who I am,” he said, “but I cherish my anonymity, and I don’t want people to throw bricks at my window or dent my car.”)

When I asked Gus why he wastes so much time and spirit commenting on our site, he replied, “It doesn’t take much of my time at all. I’ve got a personal database that I can quickly search for specific articles on various subjects of which I have, by now, tens of thousands.”


  • wjfox likes this

#2
Outlook

Outlook

    Arab Muslim

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 802 posts
  • LocationBarbary Lands
Yea, I've noticed it too that news websites with comment sections almost always had the most vile, bigotted comments on par with liveleak. Is there a reason for this?
  • wjfox likes this

The Prophet (saw) said: He who does not thank the people is not thankful to Allah.


#3
wjfox

wjfox

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,199 posts
  • LocationLondon

It's been well-documented that the fossil fuel industry employs a lot of "commenters" to spread climate disinformation. They are truly evil psychopaths.



#4
tomasth

tomasth

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 76 posts

There are many scientist that ARE corrupt and ideologicaly driven , that troll is an example ; the question is in what and about what.

 

I've seen same posting in same sites that looked and were interpreted by same as Racism and sexism , but were just a way of approaching a subject and venting frustration about it , in a way that looked Racist and sexist but weren't.

 

As for Russia collusion investigation , its called an investigation because they don't yet know. innocent until proven othewise.



#5
Alislaws

Alislaws

    Democratic Socialist Materialist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,354 posts
  • LocationLondon

There are either a lot of people who spend hours and hours every day searching out articles they disagree with and post in the comments, or there really are organised groups of people paid to push an agenda. (Or they are all sophisticated bots programmed to push an agenda)

 

Technology review annoyed me a lot, I used to read it every day (on the mailing list etc.) but they started posting a lot of those "this article contains nothing more than a rewording of a press release" type articles, and eventually I just stopped.



#6
starspawn0

starspawn0

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 505 posts
Another phenomenon that I see on some forums with trolls is the following:

Some troll will write some incredibly noxious stuff, attacking racial minorities or "the poor" or some other group. They then get called on it -- and in some cases, attacked. Then, a "white knight" shows up, acts like the "responsible adult", and defends them and commiserates with them, as though they are the ones deserving of the sympathy, and not the original, wronged party.

It may look something like this:

Troll: I think dysgenic groups from "down South" [presumably, Central and South American countries] should be intelligence tested before allowed to vote.

Critic: You're a racist piece of shit, you know that!

White Night: This is why I don't like this forum. Did it ever occur to you how you hurt people's feelings, that maybe you're the one with the problem? Is it a crime to be "consversative"? Take your name-calling somewhere else, I'm reporting you, child!
  • Yuli Ban likes this




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users