Jump to content

Welcome to FutureTimeline.forum
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Photo

I am sorry


  • Please log in to reply
15 replies to this topic

#1
Sciencerocks

Sciencerocks

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,308 posts

My behavior is uncalled for and wjfox is one of the greatest thinkers in the futurist movement and deserves more respect. I love everything he does and he is an awesome person and I also can say the same for yuli ban that I greatly respect. I deserve every ounce of the hate and criticism that I get. Sadly, because I have problems I doubt I can completely ever change as an tiger can't remove its stripes and change its nature.

 

Respect and value all the admins, mods and members of this great board.  


  • Jakob likes this

#2
Yuli Ban

Yuli Ban

    Born Again Singularitarian

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 20,415 posts
  • LocationNew Orleans, LA

Your only problem was how hard you were raging against SJWs, though, often without much provocation. No one's asking for you to step up to a microphone and declare your crimes against the vragi proletariata, just that you tone it down in the future so as to not drive away any visitors during a time when site traffic is already low.


  • Erowind and rennerpetey like this

And remember my friend, future events such as these will affect you in the future.


#3
Outlook

Outlook

    Arab Muslim

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,054 posts
  • LocationBarbary Lands

This is all thanks to our fuhrer, Sciencerocks. Pray that he gives you mercy and doesn't send the Gestapo after you.

 

-- Hail the fatherland

 

TZije7.gif


Outlook's secret song of the ~week: https://youtu.be/z97qLNXeAMQ


#4
As We Rise

As We Rise

    Matthew 24:12, NIV

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 735 posts

Your only problem was how hard you were raging against SJWs

What was my problem?


Also I refuse to apologise for a thought crime.
  • BasilBerylium likes this

The reality? There are millions of normal people who are starting to LIKE the idea of fascism BECAUSE there are literal bolsheviks flooding the streets and attacking people. I swear to God, when the Left actually gets the storm they've been preaching about, you won't even see it on the news. The population will just shrink from 330 million to 230 million overnight and nobody will ever speak of it again.


#5
BasilBerylium

BasilBerylium

    Banned

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 734 posts

No one's asking for you to step up to a microphone and declare your crimes against the vragi proletariata, just that you tone it down in the future so as to not drive away any visitors during a time when site traffic is already low

Please elaborate


This website has a magic that makes people draw back here like moths to light.


#6
Frizz

Frizz

    fey pansexual alcoholic non-human

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,375 posts
  • Locationsomewhere over the rainbow
Just pull your head in and get a grip of yourself.

This isn't a therapy forum, we discuss futurism.

Honestly, the amount of emotionally unhinged neurotics here is exhausting.
  • BasilBerylium likes this
“Give me time and I’ll give you a revolution.”
- Alexander McQueen

#7
rennerpetey

rennerpetey

    Fighting Corporations since 2020

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 553 posts
  • LocationNot in Kansas anymore

 

Your only problem was how hard you were raging against SJWs

What was my problem?


Also I refuse to apologise for a thought crime.

 

You post things about Europe being a hellhole because of immigration, refuse to back it up with sources,  and get upset when we try to debate you about it.  I've been blocked twice now from your updates simply for asking for a source for you claims.  In all honesty you probably won't even see this because I'm blocked.  I don't care what you think, but back up your arguments with evidence and be ready to debate if you don't want us to disregard everything you say.


John Lennon dares you to make sense of this

Spoiler

#8
BasilBerylium

BasilBerylium

    Banned

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 734 posts

This isn't a therapy forum, we discuss futurism.

This.


This website has a magic that makes people draw back here like moths to light.


#9
Erowind

Erowind

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 951 posts

Just pull your head in and get a grip of yourself.

This isn't a therapy forum, we discuss futurism.

Honestly, the amount of emotionally unhinged neurotics here is exhausting.

 

I think it's pretty clear this forum is much more than futurism for a lot of people here. I tell yinz things I don't tell anyone else.


Current status: slaving away for the math gods of Pythagoras VII.


#10
caltrek

caltrek

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,218 posts

Just pull your head in and get a grip of yourself.

This isn't a therapy forum, we discuss futurism.

Honestly, the amount of emotionally unhinged neurotics here is exhausting.

 

:angry:  :king:  :cool:  

 

LOL.


The principles of justice define an appropriate path between dogmatism and intolerance on the one side, and a reductionism which regards religion and morality as mere preferences on the other.   - John Rawls


#11
caltrek

caltrek

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,218 posts

 

 

Your only problem was how hard you were raging against SJWs

What was my problem?


Also I refuse to apologise for a thought crime.

 

You post things about Europe being a hellhole because of immigration, refuse to back it up with sources,  and get upset when we try to debate you about it.  I've been blocked twice now from your updates simply for asking for a source for you claims.  In all honesty you probably won't even see this because I'm blocked.  I don't care what you think, but back up your arguments with evidence and be ready to debate if you don't want us to disregard everything you say.

 

 

I haven't seen the posts regarding Europe, but I totally agree with the need to back up arguments. There is nothing wrong with tweeted opinions. The problem comes when frustration is expressed with the response to such tweets. Either surrender the field or back up your tweets with evidence.

 

...and please...no more of this "I don't trust your fake news source" crap.  If you think a particular story is biased and leaves out important facts or is other wise not accurate, then explain yourself. Cite other sources.  Document what is inaccurate. Don't just sit there whining about "liberal bias."    


  • rennerpetey likes this

The principles of justice define an appropriate path between dogmatism and intolerance on the one side, and a reductionism which regards religion and morality as mere preferences on the other.   - John Rawls


#12
caltrek

caltrek

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,218 posts

My behavior is uncalled for and wjfox is one of the greatest thinkers in the futurist movement and deserves more respect. I love everything he does and he is an awesome person and I also can say the same for yuli ban that I greatly respect. I deserve every ounce of the hate and criticism that I get. Sadly, because I have problems I doubt I can completely ever change as an tiger can't remove its stripes and change its nature.

 

Respect and value all the admins, mods and members of this great board.  

 

 

Well deserved compliments for wjfox and yuli ban.


  • Sciencerocks likes this

The principles of justice define an appropriate path between dogmatism and intolerance on the one side, and a reductionism which regards religion and morality as mere preferences on the other.   - John Rawls


#13
Yuli Ban

Yuli Ban

    Born Again Singularitarian

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 20,415 posts
  • LocationNew Orleans, LA

 

Your only problem was how hard you were raging against SJWs

What was my problem?


Also I refuse to apologise for a thought crime.

 

You were using actual Stormfront copypasta. Most notably: "Africa for Africans; Asia for Asians; Europe for EVERYBODY" and stopped short of saying "Anti-racist is codeword for anti-White".
 
Like it or not, I'm not very tolerant like others and never have been; I believe in hard objective facts that cannot be debated, unlike more "open-minded progressive" types. The moment I saw that blatant copypasta being used, that was it.

In fact, it's almost funny how you claim that you've been "redpilled" when you adopted a worldview that's entirely false and crafted over time by others to deny reality.

As seen below: 
 
https://web.archive..../forum/t705280/
 
http://gtx0.com/view.php?post=87730
Quote

so, there's a group of stormfronters called "swarmfront." they spam other sites with their "mantra" and other racist propaganda. these are their talking points:



1 Stay on message; we deal with the genocide of White people and the perpetrators, anti-Whites. When talking to the general public don't go into a rant about Jewish conspiracies, banking families, NWO, etc. White genocide is the first step to establish a beachhead in the general population's consciousness -- we can expand on other ideas later.

2 Use the Mantra and our talking points. Everything anti-Whites say always leads to our genocide, and we have good ways to counter their talking points. You can customise our stuff and use it for yourself.

3 Use our terminology; "Anti-White", "Pro-White", "White genocide", "Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-White", "Africa for the Africans, Asia for the Asians, White countries for everybody".

4 "Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-White" should be the last thing in your post if possible.

5 Don't use their terminology; "racist" should ONLY be used in "anti-racist"; "nazi" should ONLY be used in naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews"; "HATE!", "holocaust", "facist" "LOVE!" should be avoided; "diversity", "multicultural" can be pointed out as meaning less White people. Avoid using "The White race", "Caucasians", "The Whites", because it makes it look distant and turns it into a philosophical debate; use 'Our people', 'My people', 'White people', etc.

6 Capitalize "White", when you're talking about our race.

7 ALWAYS use "Genocide", NEVER use "Extinction", "Population Displacement", "Demographics shift", etc.

8 NEVER call them "antis", they are "anti-White" - they are against White people existing.

9 Use "As an anti-White" e.g. "As an anti-White why do you think more assimilation is required in ONLY White countries?".

10 Don't argue, make our point: ALL White countries & ONLY White countries are told by anti-Whites, who claim to be "anti-racist", that they must accept millions of non-Whites and 'assimilate' with them, which is genocide under UN genocide conventions. If people get annoyed of hearing our message that's good, it means they can remember it!

11 This isn't about anti-Whites; we are talking to the general public, USE the anti-Whites to humilate them and point out that they support White genocide. A lot of the general public are tired of "anti-racists" (anti-Whites) and WE have to show them how to defeat and humiliate them.

12 Be aggressive and take the moral high-ground; if they call you names say "You're only saying that because I'm White".

13 Think before you talk. Talking about commiting violence is a no-go. No talking about genocide tribunals because it makes us look dangerous. Using lots of bad language is going to make you - and us - look stupid. That does not mean treat anti-Whites with dignity.

14 YOU ask the questions. If you don't get a reply keep asking them - it means your opponent is embarrassed and is trying to get off the subject. If they demand you answer questions say "WE ask the questions, because YOU support/justify genocide of MY people!".

15 Use emotional language; "Why do you hate little White children?", "Why do you want to genocide little White babies?".

16 Winning isn't important; you should be winning all of the arguments with the anti-Whites if you do what Bugsters do, but don't worry if you lose a few of them -- this is about imposing our terminology and getting the public talking about White genocide.

17 Know your target audience and wrap our message around what appeals to them. Young adults want to talk about education fees and housing prices, Teens want to talk about music, Old people want to talk about pensions, etc. Try to connect with the people using their language/colloquialisms e.g. "Dude" "Mate" "Bloke" "Howdy" "Yeah" "Lol" "Rofl"

18 Flip the script. What if ALL Asian countries were told to bring in immigrants and assimilate with them? What if "anti-racists" in Africa demanded that Africans stopped patrolling their borders and kicking out illegal immigrants?

19 We're all part of the team. Remember to report any places that you post The Mantra or mini-Mantras in Where did you post the Mantra today? II Bugsters will offer you advice if you're new, ask them for help Swarming and they'll arrive on the link to help you out.

 
 
Directly from Stormfront
Quote

Join the first ever OD moonbat shoot! Invite your friends!

http://www.occidenta....it-and-racism/

Angela Motorman has another thread about White Nationalism on Reddit Politics. This time around she isn’t directly linking to us. The link goes to the Google cache of Discourse Poisoning: An Hour A Day. Horrified liberals are strutting around in the comments and flapping their wings about “racism.” To their credit, a few Reddit members have made some insightful posts that I found interesting.

Here’s the situation: liberal moonbats dominate the Politics sub-reddit on Reddit. They gang up on right-leaning posters and enforce a taboo on politically incorrect content. They systematically down vote conservatives, libertarians, and racialists regardless of the quality of their links and comments. The other side of the coin is that they up vote the most retarded liberal nonsense. So the Politics section ends up being kind of like a sewer: their **** floats on top of higher quality political news and analysis.

They’re not supposed to do this. It is a violation of Reddiquette. You’re not supposed to down vote links and comments solely because you disagree with them. The quality of the link or comment is supposed to be what matters. If it is a good piece of analysis from a conservative perspective, you should up vote the story even if you are a liberal, and vice versa. This ideal of fairness (which I happen to agree with) doesn’t work in practice. Reddit is dominated by liberal anti-racist ideologues bent on forcing their views on others.

Let’s slap some sense into these people.

1.) Go to Reddit.com
2.) Look at the top right side of the screen. Register an account. This only takes a few seconds.
3.) Look at the bar that runs on the top of the screen. Click on “Politics.” That takes you to the Politics sub-reddit.
4.) Search for posts that concern us. Start with the most recent ones about White Nationalism. Here are the direct links:

White Nationalist Calls for Systematic Discourse Poisoning
Racists Discuss How To Gain Influence on Reddit

5.) There should be up and down arrows besides the original story and the comments in each thread.
6.) Click the down arrow on every annoying liberal, anti-White comment.
7.) Click the up arrow on every good comment. These are often buried below the threshold.
8.) Leave your own pro-White comments, participate in the discussions, post your own threads to the Politics and WhiteRights sub-reddits.
9.) Keep doing this until the anti-Whites on Reddit are forced to play by the rules.
10.) I spend thirty minutes to an hour every day doing this. It is a productive way to waste time.
11.) Spread the word on Facebook.
12.) Post about it on your own blog. Start threads about this on popular WN discussion groups.

White Nationalists always say they want to “do something.” Well, here’s your chance. This could not be easier. It takes only a few minutes. It can be done anonymously. It doesn’t require you to spend any money. Did I mention it is fun?

Most threads and comments only get a few up and down votes. There are thousands of White Nationalists on the internet. Liberals on Reddit drastically underestimate our numbers. The pro-White community is one of the largest social groups on the internet. If we were ever inclined to do so, we could upset the balance of power and eliminate the leftist bias over there.

Let’s get started.

 
Quote

Exactly. I should add that you have to feel out the moderation level of the forum. At Youtube it's pretty much anything goes. For most other political forums you have to expect some ad hominems to be tossed your way, and you shouldn't respond with one. They're looking for a reason to ban you, so don't fall into the trap of responding like with like and getting banned. Just back yourself up with the facts you've read on SF. They will get very, very upset at you.

Be sure to point out the ad hominems when they get tossed out anyway.

BTW, what do you guys typically say when you are called a "racist"? I'd like to hear how you typically respond. Depending on my mood, I'll say something like, "You're calling me a racist, but you're not calling me wrong", or "You called me a "racist" but that's just school-yard name-calling. The debate doesn't end with you using an ad hominem."

When they go "Godwin's Law" on you, then you must quote the definition from Wikipedia.

Anyway... I did create an account on Reddit. So I can do my part.

 
Quote

We need to get on these social bookmarking websites. Most online newspapers, magazines, and blogs have the little icons that let you submit content to Digg and Reddit. They get a huge amount of traffic. It is a place where we need to get our foot in the door.



I could go on and on about why the immigration problem isn't anywhere near as much of a problem as you think it is and that so much of the fearmongering and "rapefugee" lies are literal propaganda and lies pushed by certain outlets whose intention is to rile up ultranationalist and neo-fascist ideologies, but it's already clear you've made up your mind.


And remember my friend, future events such as these will affect you in the future.


#14
Jakob

Jakob

    Groveling Goblin

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,090 posts

You're a good guy, Sciencerocks. You've always been very funny and I like your thoughts on futurism.


  • Sciencerocks, Yuli Ban and Outlook like this

#15
caltrek

caltrek

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,218 posts

 

 

I could go on and on about why the immigration problem isn't anywhere near as much of a problem as you think it is and that so much of the fearmongering and "rapefugee" lies are literal propaganda and lies pushed by certain outlets whose intention is to rile up ultranationalist and neo-fascist ideologies, but it's already clear you've made up your mind.

 

 

Not to pick on As We Rise in particular, but that is how communication decays over the internet. People become really into expressing their opinions - tweet fashion - and totally uninterested in listening to everybody else's opinion.  So they congregate in communities of people who agree with each other.  The really pathetic thing is that often they think they are in a large group when really all they are doing is talking to a bunch of Russian bot masters.  Of course, then they go to the polls and the trouble really begins...


  • Outlook likes this

The principles of justice define an appropriate path between dogmatism and intolerance on the one side, and a reductionism which regards religion and morality as mere preferences on the other.   - John Rawls


#16
Alislaws

Alislaws

    Democratic Socialist Materialist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,883 posts
  • LocationLondon

The only problem I have on this forum is posts from people who are posting with no intent or desire to discuss what they are posting about.

 

(not complaining about  posts which just links to news articles with no real poster opinion attached, those obviously are intended to inform people, and the original poster doesn't need to join in discussing every interesting article they post, that would be crazy! When would sciencerocks sleep?)

 

I come to this forum to discuss things, and share ​opinions. I have no interest in reading people's fire and forget tweets and having all responses ignored. If someone is not interested in discussing a topic, then they shouldn't post about it on an internet discussion forum.

 

Anyone who wants to just vent their opinions and ignore responses can scream into a pillow or just get an account on twitter like all the other people who like ranting into the void...


  • caltrek and rennerpetey like this




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users