Jump to content

Welcome to FutureTimeline.forum
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Photo

Progressive/Socialist/Marxist/Communist Watch Thread

Progressives Socialism Marxism Communism (anti)Fa Centralisation Discrimination Sexism Racism Identity Politics

  • Please log in to reply
47 replies to this topic

#41
starspawn0

starspawn0

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,263 posts
https://mobile.twitt...687373515972608






This is amazing.

Read this for extremely valuable insight into how DC and "centrism" functions and what drives it:


That's the funniest thing I've seen all week!

Greenwald is presenting Jason Pontin as some kind of high-level insider of DC "centrism".

He knows exactly who Pontin is, as do I, and have been following his writings for years. Pontin
was editor-in-chief of Technology Review, then was a freelance writer for Wired -- e.g. he wrote that Wired article about Mary Lou Jepsen I posted a couple months ago. And he also does some work for the organization described in that thread.

He's not the kind of authority on DC centrism Greenwald portrays, and Greenwald knows it. It's like a tweet straight out of that Economic Hitman book (if tweets existed back when it was written!).

Pontin is American-raised, to English parents, and speaks with a English accent -- sounds a little like the actor Paul Bettany. He has a fondness for big words, and likes to engage with a broad range of people on Twitter, sometimes trolls. He's not above a dose of comedy, and this thread might be one of his jokes.

Incidentally, he was a fan of Gary Marcus's criticisms of deep learning -- even though I doubt he knew the issues very well.

Ha ha ha! That tweet by Greenwald made my day.

#42
Alislaws

Alislaws

    Democratic Socialist Materialist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,106 posts
  • LocationLondon

I'm hoping discussing "successful" progressive revolutions constitutes part of this topic. How many do people (especially Caltrek and zEVerzan and Erowind) think there have been?

 

The American revolution was progressive, but it was effectively a bunch of wealthy landowners throwing off control of a bunch of other wealthy landowners in London. And they carried right on with slavery etc. S o not really an example of the ordinary man seizing control of his future. Still this was a revolution that was progressive in many ways, eliminating the idea of blood rights to rule etc and it gave the USA a constitution that kept the nation working as functioning republic for a long time (arguably its still going to this day, but it seems very naïve to call the US political situation democratic)

 

The French revolution 1789:

Got a lot of people beheaded (Which is more traditional than shooting!) but it did kick out the oligarchs (king and nobles etc.).

Aaaand replaced them with a huge mess, and then with a dictator who spent the next, few decades bleeding France white trying to defeat the whole of the rest of (counterrevolutionary) Europe. 

He was very progressive for his time though in all sorts of ways, and basically established a highly meritocratic state.

Then he got kicked out by counterrevolutionary Europe.

Then they had more monarchy for a few decades then his cousin or something became emperor again (after a brief republican fling?).

Finally in 1870 nearly 80 years after "the revolution"​ they managed a republic and made it stick (till WW2 ruined everything). 

 

Would you call the Russian revolution a progressive or even a successful one? They mostly replaced one oligarchy (the nobles and royals of Tsarist Russia) with a different oligarchy (the Communist party) and (as always) had a lot of people shot in the process. 

 

Finding a clear cut "the common people rose up and instituted liberty equality and democracy and then everything was ok and stable for a long time" is not so easy. 



#43
zEVerzan

zEVerzan

    Orange Animating Android

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,744 posts
  • LocationSome Underground Sweatshop Probably

^I'm glad you asked. I think about it from the point of historical materialism. It's a matter of deciding what "progressive" means for its time.

 

The French and American revolutions can be thought of as revolutions of the feudal merchant class, throwing off the yoke of hereditary leadership and transitioning toward a society ruled by holders of capital - which was progress, yes, but those merchants were already well on their way to being bourgeoisie.

 

The Russian revolution was only successful in the sense that it deposed the decayed feudal system, but they severely jumped the gun in terms of what they expected from their largely pre-industrial infrastructure. They did industrialize, sure, but at a severe human cost and their revolution failed in what it set out to do since absolute power once again found itself in the hands of very few rulers.

 

I'd qualify a successful progressive revolution in the modern time as one by the labor/working class which takes place in a decaying capitalist system, one which already has the infrastructure, technology, and economy, to jump-start a society that's more focused on sustainability and the common good rather than the growth and accumulation of wealth.


I always imagined the future as a time of more reason, empathy, and peace, not less. It's time for a change.
Attention is currency in the "free marketplace of ideas".
I do other stuff besides gripe about the future! Twitter Youtube DeviantArt +-PATREON-+

#44
starspawn0

starspawn0

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,263 posts
https://mobile.twitt...130978670133248

A Chapo Traphouse host making Brad Parscale happy this evening, ruling out Biden but leaving open the possibility of voting for Trump.



#45
PhoenixRu

PhoenixRu

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,257 posts

I wasn't sure where to post my finding so I'll post it here:

 

Seattle Public Schools Will Start Teaching That Math Is Oppressive

 

Seattle's four-page framework is still in the proposal stage. If adopted, its ideas will be included in existing math classes as part of the district's broader effort to infuse ethnic studies into all subjects across the K-12 spectrum. Tracy Castro-Gill, Seattle's ethnic studies director, said her team hopes to have frameworks completed in all subjects by June for board approval.
 
If the frameworks are approved, teachers would be expected to incorporate those ideas and questions into the math they teach beginning next fall, Castro-Gill said. No districtwide—or mandated—math/ethnic studies curriculum is planned, but groups of teachers are working with representatives of local community organizations to write instructional units for teachers to use if they wish, she said.
 
"Seattle is definitely on the forefront with this," said Robert Q. Berry III, the president of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. "What they're doing follows the line of work we hope we can move forward as we think about the history of math and who contributes to that, and also about deepening students' connection with identity and agency."

 

 

New 'Social Justice' Math Class Teaches Kids That Math Is Evil, Dehumanizing

 

"In western mathematics, our ways of knowing include formalized reasoning or proof, decontextualization, and algorithmic thinking, leaving little room for those having non-western mathematical skills and thinking processes," the training course claims.
 
It continues:
 
"Mathematical ethics recognizes that, for centuries, mathematics has been used as a dehumanizing tool… mathematics formulae also differentiate between the classifications of a war or a genocide and have been used to trick indigenous peoples out of land and property."


#46
eacao

eacao

    Lobster

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 501 posts
  • LocationAustralia

Biden fires Dr. Will Roper -- former assistant secretary of airforce acquisition. 

 

Will Roper was a gun. He spearheaded the new 'century series' program, which had the aim of combatting the incalcitrant defence acquisition process that produced excessively expensive and delayed projects like the F-35. Roper pursued an aim of reducing the development schedules of new aircraft down to 5 years. This mandated iterative design processes, using advanced manufacturing techniques, to produce novel aircraft in small batches with capabilities at the bleeding edge. 

 

"Instead of trying to keep up with our adversaries, we became chaos".

 

His neo Century Series program was a great reflection of Musk's "if you're not innovating, you're dead" philosophy.

 

Biden fired him. 


If you're going through hell, keep going. - Winston Churchill

Opportunity lurks where responsibility has been abdicated - Jordan Peterson
Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power. - Abraham Lincoln.


#47
caltrek

caltrek

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,560 posts

@Eacao,

 

Do you have a news source you can link regarding Biden "firing" Roper.  the only thing I can finds is a dated article showing that Rpoer was expecting to leave the administration despite discussions suggesting that he should not resign:

 

The transition team of President-elect Joe Biden has reached out to U.S. Air Force acquisition chief Will Roper about a possible role in the new administration, but Roper is so far planning to leave his position before Inauguration Day on Jan. 20.

 

https://www.defensed...role/air-force/


The principles of justice define an appropriate path between dogmatism and intolerance on the one side, and a reductionism which regards religion and morality as mere preferences on the other.   - John Rawls


#48
eacao

eacao

    Lobster

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 501 posts
  • LocationAustralia

@Eacao,

 

Do you have a news source you can link regarding Biden "firing" Roper.  the only thing I can finds is a dated article showing that Rpoer was expecting to leave the administration despite discussions suggesting that he should not resign:

 

 

This is a legitimate point. I'm going by assumptions. 

 

Relatively low-level positions are not news-worthy and don't warrant exposès. It's normal for a person in Roper's position to be replaced with an incoming administration, but it's not likely to be because they choose to cut their career short. 

 

I doubt Biden personally oversaw the decision. I imagine Sec Def Austin would have had clear instructions to clean house and remove Trump's apparatus, under orders from POTUS. Democrat-loyalists only. Not unusual, but Roper is sorely missed from my corner in the Indo Pacific. 

 

The man was visionary and bold, and I had high hopes for him. Competent's the word.


If you're going through hell, keep going. - Winston Churchill

Opportunity lurks where responsibility has been abdicated - Jordan Peterson
Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power. - Abraham Lincoln.






Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Progressives, Socialism, Marxism, Communism, (anti)Fa, Centralisation, Discrimination, Sexism, Racism, Identity Politics

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users