Jump to content

Welcome to FutureTimeline.forum
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Photo

The dangers and risks of having nanobots inside the body


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1
CyberMisterBeauty

CyberMisterBeauty

    The most beautiful male in the universe

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 578 posts
  • LocationThe largest city of the year 2192,celebrating my 200th birthday

Hi people!

 

It is been a while since my last thread, and today I would like your opinion about how dangerous would it be to implant nanobots inside the body. The nanomachines could do miracles. They could repair DNA and cells, cure cancer, boost the immune system, permorm genetic engineering, change physical features, gather stem cellls for other uses, control colestherol and glucose levels, reverse aging, enhance mental and physical skills, among many other things.

 

But I also think that many people would be afraid of the idea of having nanoscale robots inside them. There is another thread about fully immersive virtual reality which WJFOX said that the nanobots could destroy a person's brain. I don't think so because the nanobots themselves would be extremely small and therefore have relatively low functionality. Moreover, the nanobots could not take decisions by their own due to their size and individual computing power, they would have to be controlled somehow, either by computer programs or neural commands or something else. Because of this, I really doubt that medical nanobots would ever be that dangerous.



#2
funkervogt

funkervogt

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,015 posts

An important limiting factor is that nanobots wouldn't last forever inside a human body, and would start breaking down and running out of energy pretty fast. A limited lifespan means they can cause a limited amount of damage through malfunction. 



#3
Maximum7

Maximum7

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 198 posts
Their is also the factor of nanotoxicity.

#4
CyberMisterBeauty

CyberMisterBeauty

    The most beautiful male in the universe

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 578 posts
  • LocationThe largest city of the year 2192,celebrating my 200th birthday

An important limiting factor is that nanobots wouldn't last forever inside a human body, and would start breaking down and running out of energy pretty fast. A limited lifespan means they can cause a limited amount of damage through malfunction. 

 

I don`t think so, since they would be so small they would run on ridiculously small amounts of the person`s body glucose or ATP molecules for energy. I even think that they could be more useful on overweight people because they could run even on the person`s fat that is stored inside fat cells.

 

Their is also the factor of nanotoxicity.

 

 What on Earth is that?






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users