Please vote in above poll.
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Posted 05 November 2019 - 04:49 PM
Posted 08 November 2019 - 11:24 PM
Ok, I will admit it. I am one of those who marked the Other/Not Sure box.
The thing is I worked for government agencies for most of my life. Learned that some conspiracy theories were right on the mark, while others were just a matter of paranoia getting the best of people. This from an insider's perspective.
That experience also makes me a little more sympathetic to the stupidity defense. Especially when we are dealing with a facility that was chronically under-funded. Who knew that anybody else gave a damn about this suicidal nut case?
Of course, another major reason is that I simply have not followed that particular story that closely. Enough to be slightly interested, but not enough to come to any definitive conclusion.
The principles of justice define an appropriate path between dogmatism and intolerance on the one side, and a reductionism which regards religion and morality as mere preferences on the other. - John Rawls
Posted 09 November 2019 - 06:39 AM
Posted 09 November 2019 - 04:59 PM
I think if he wasn't killed, he was "allowed" to kill himself. I can certainly understand why a man in his position would kill himself.
Dino Synth is my new favourite genre
Posted 09 November 2019 - 08:28 PM
At first I thought he was allowed to kill himself, but assassination doesn't seem too far-fetched. Either way I'm convinced there was foul play. I can't remember any prisoner who both had so many powerful people wanting him dead and who was most likely to kill themselves. It was my naive assumption that he would have unparalleled levels of surveillance (e.g. two guards watching at all times, regular check ups, multiple cameras connected through different systems with multiple fail safes etc.) and therefore there would be zero chance of him being able to commit suicide, especially considering he attempted suicide just weeks earlier. Being taken off suicide watch is just unfathomable and unbelievable to me. This is really the only popular conspiracy theory I subscribe to.
Posted 17 November 2019 - 07:57 AM
Prince Andrew, in a BBC interview with Emily Maitlis, denies having sex with Virginia Roberts (now Virginia Giuffre) when she was a teenager, and expresses regret at having met Epstein in 2010:
[...] The prince’s answers are likely to ensure he remains in the headlines for the conceivable future, and several commentators have condemned his approach. Catherine Mayer, founder of the Women’s Equality Party, tweeted that the prince was “too stupid to even pretend concern for Epstein’s victims”.
Charlie Proctor, editor of the Royal Central website, said: “I expected a train wreck. That was a plane crashing into an oil tanker, causing a tsunami, triggering a nuclear explosion level bad.”
Posted 20 November 2019 - 06:53 PM
Prince Andrew stepping back from royal duties
The Duke of York says he is stepping back from royal duties because the Jeffrey Epstein scandal has become a "major disruption" to the Royal Family.
Prince Andrew said he had asked the Queen for permission to withdraw for the "foreseeable future".
He said he deeply sympathised with sex offender Epstein's victims and everyone who "wants some form of closure".
The duke has faced a growing backlash following a BBC interview about his friendship with US financier Epstein.
In a statement, he said: "I continue to unequivocally regret my ill-judged association with Jeffrey Epstein.
"His suicide has left many unanswered questions, particularly for his victims, and I deeply sympathise with everyone who has been affected and wants some form of closure.
"I can only hope that, in time, they will be able to rebuild their lives."
He added that he was "willing to help any appropriate law enforcement agency with their investigations, if required".
Posted 06 December 2019 - 10:33 PM
And remember my friend, future events such as these will affect you in the future.
Posted 12 December 2019 - 01:14 PM
Posted 19 December 2019 - 08:30 AM
Posted 09 January 2020 - 07:10 PM
Whats more suspicious jeffery epsteins "suicide" or the worst plane crash for quite some time where by the plane lit on fire mid air due to "technical difficulty's" over Iran right when the US and Iran were at the brink of war
Posted 27 January 2020 - 07:42 PM
Prince Andrew giving 'zero' cooperation to Epstein inquiry, say US prosecutors
Mon 27 Jan 2020 19.03 GMT
Prince Andrew has provided “zero” cooperation with the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking inquiry, US prosecutors said on Monday, despite earlier promises to help investigations in any way possible.
Speaking outside Epstein’s Manhattan mansion, Geoffrey Berman, US attorney for the southern district of New York, said the agencies had contacted Andrew regarding an interview, but that he had not yet agreed to provide one.
It is understood that there will be no attempt to force Andrew to testify, leaving open the possibility that he will never answer prosecutors’ questions about his relationship with Epstein.
Prince Andrew, 59, stepped back from royal duties in November, following a widely-criticized interview with the BBC about his friendship with Epstein.
At the time, Andrew, said he was “willing to help any appropriate law enforcement agency with their investigations if required” over the ongoing US probe into Epstein – who was charged with sex-trafficking.
But at a press conference in New York City’s Upper East Side, Berman told reporters that requests had so far gone unanswered.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users