Then there's all the other little details, such as sexuality, humanity, purpose, progress and how it's defined, etc. Cyberpunk tackled these issues, so Solarpunk would need to as well if it's intended purpose is to be a solution to the issues of the former.
Your opening post would hint at a society a lot more decentralized, which is fine, but I'd consider every possibility. "Solarpunk" needs to stand out on its own in order to be a viable future alternative. Every bit as advanced if not more so than Cyberpunk, so as to not equate it with "bamboo" technology, or primitive archaism.
I suppose the assumption at the heart of Solarpunk is that worlds as depicted by Cyberpunk...
- overpopulated, polluted, elderly cities...
- existing among ecologically devastated planets...
- ruled by rampant capitalism, vast and ossified institutions, and multinational megacorporations...
- faced with technologies that subvert the human condition rather than enhance it...
...are not only dystopian as intended, they're inherently unsustainable on their face - and such a world is where we're headed.
How could a cyberpunk-style civilization last a human lifetime, let alone centuries or millennia? Being always within the throes of such aggressive change, isn't it only a matter of time before the internal contradictions of such a society lead to its collapse if we aren't saved by hand-wavey techbro solutions?
So how do we avoid that? And if we can't avoid that, what comes after it? If we're already in a cyberpunk world, could we run off to the hills and found the futuristic social-equivalent of an Amish settlement without eschewing the technology and QoL?
To address your other questions individually:
- sexuality: solarpunk leans toward a great degree of social anarchism with few stigmas around sexuality. Expect polycules and creches to be as socially acceptable as the suburban nuclear family.
- humanity: some degree of transhumanism isn't incompatible with solarpunk, as no knowledge of medicine, bioengineering and cybernetics ought to be lost - the thing that really matters is how it's used. I can only imagine that your average billionaire's ambitions to reject humanity altogether and ascend to become our digital god-king would be frowned upon to put it lightly.
- purpose: community, beauty, to work toward a better planet and an ever more fulfilling, sustainable way of life.
- progress: where civilization and nature work for each other rather than against each other, progress is when greater degrees of harmony are reached and the various destructive consequences of the anthropocene are mitigated or undone. For example, is it possible to use bioengineering technology to craft an intricate ecosystem from scratch that also generates power?
The "punk" in solarpunk refers to the rebellion against notions of progress as defined by billionaires who've looked at the warnings of cyberpunk and said, "...yeah. That's the world I want"
Solarpunk: Notes Toward A Manifesto
It’s hard out here for futurists under 30.
As we percolated through our respective nations’ education systems, we were exposed to WorldChanging and TED talks, to artfully-designed green consumerism and sustainable development NGOs. Yet we also grew up with doomsday predictions slated to hit before our expected retirement ages, with the slow but inexorable militarization of metropolitan police departments, with the failure of the existing political order to deal with the existential-but-not-yet-urgent threat of climate change. Many of us feel it’s unethical to bring children into a world like ours. We have grown up under a shadow, and if we sometimes resemble fungus it should be taken as a credit to our adaptability.
We’re solarpunks because the only other options are denial or despair.
The promises offered by most Singulatarians and Transhumanists are individualist and unsustainable: How many of them are scoped for a world where energy is not cheap and plentiful, to say nothing of rare earth elements?
Solarpunk is about finding ways to make life more wonderful for us right now, and more importantly for the generations that follow us – i.e., extending human life at the species level, rather than individually. Our future must involve repurposing and creating new things from what we already have (instead of 20th century “destroy it all and build something completely different” modernism). Our futurism is not nihilistic like cyberpunk and it avoids steampunk’s potentially quasi-reactionary tendencies: it is about ingenuity, generativity, independence, and community.
And yes, there’s a -punk there, and not just because it’s become a trendy suffix. There’s an oppositional quality to solarpunk, but it’s an opposition that begins with infrastructure as a form of resistance. We’re already seeing it in the struggles of public utilities to deal with the explosion in rooftop solar. “Dealing with infrastructure is a protection against being robbed of one’s self-determination,” said Chokwe Lumumba, the late mayor of Jackson, MS, and he was right. Certainly there are good reasons to have a grid, and we don’t want it to rot away, but one of the healthy things about local resilience is that it puts you in a much better bargaining position against the people who might want to shut you off (We’re looking at you, Detroit).
Solarpunk punkSolarpunk draws on the ideal of Jefferson’s yeoman farmer, Ghandi’s ideal of swadeshi and subsequent Salt March, and countless other traditions of innovative dissent. (FWIW, both Ghandi and Jefferson were inventors.)
The visual aesthetics of Solarpunk are open and evolving. As it stands, it’s a mash-up of the following:
1800s age-of-sail/frontier living (but with more bicycles)
Creative reuse of existing infrastructure (sometimes post-apocalyptic, sometimes present-weird)
Jugaad-style innovation from the developing world
High-tech backends with simple, elegant outputs
Obviously, the further you get into the future, the more ambitious you can get. In the long-term, solarpunk takes the images we’ve been fed by bright-green blogs and draws them out further, longer, and deeper. Imagine permaculturists thinking in cathedral time. Consider terraced irrigation systems that also act as fluidic computers. Contemplate the life of a Department of Reclamation officer managing a sparsely populated American southwest given over to solar collection and pump storage. Imagine “smart cities” being junked in favor of smart citizenry.
Tumblr lit up within the last week from this post envisioning a form of solar punk with an art nouveau Edwardian-garden aesthetic, which is gorgeous and reminds me of Miyazaki. There’s something lovely in the way it reacts against the mainstream visions of overly smooth, clean, white modernist iPod futures. Solarpunk is a future with a human face and dirt behind its ears.