AI & Robotics News and Discussions

User avatar
Yuli Ban
Posts: 4631
Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 4:44 pm

Re: AI & Robotics News and Discussions

Post by Yuli Ban »

Tang Jie, the Tsinghua University professor leading the Wu Dao project, said in a recent interview that the group built an even bigger, 100 trillion-parameter model in June, though it has not trained it to “convergence,” the point at which the model stops improving. “We just wanted to prove that we have the ability to do that,” Tang said.

This isn’t simple one-upmanship. On the one hand, it’s how research progresses. But on the other, it is emblematic of an intensifying competition between the world’s two technology superpowers. Whether the researchers involved like it or not, their governments are eager to adopt each AI advance into their national security infrastructure and military capabilities.

That matters, because dominance in the technology means probable victory in any future war. Even more important, such an advantage likely guarantees the longevity and global influence of the government that wields it. Already, China is exporting its AI-enabled surveillance technology—which can be used to quash dissent—to client states and is espousing an authoritarian model that promises economic prosperity as a counter to democracy, something that the Soviet Union was never able to do.

Ironically, China is a competitor that the United States abetted. It’s well known that the U.S. consumer market fed China’s export engine, itself outfitted with U.S. machines, and led to the fastest-growing economy in the world since the 1980s. What’s less well-known is how a handful of technology companies transferred the know-how and trained the experts now giving the United States a run for its money in AI.
gwern
They obviously don't have the compute to train even a 100t MoE (yet, maybe next year), but simply training a 100t-parameterfor a few steps is still quite impressive. (Note that it's not necessarily that impressive as there's already been embeddings/recommender models around that scale.)
And remember my friend, future events such as these will affect you in the future
User avatar
Yuli Ban
Posts: 4631
Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 4:44 pm

Re: AI & Robotics News and Discussions

Post by Yuli Ban »

Artificial Intelligence Can Now Craft Original Jokes—And That’s No Laughing Matter
Don’t you hate it,” says Jon the Robot, gesturing with tiny articulated arms at an expectant crowd, “when you’re trying to solve inverse kinematics equations to pick up a cup and then you get ‘Error 453, no solution found’?” The crowd laughs. “Don’t you hate that?”

An experiment billed as a comedy act, Jon is the brainchild of Naomi Fitter, an assistant professor in the School of Mechanical, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering at Oregon State University. The tiny android performs when a handler (who must also hold the mic) presses a button, then tells the same jokes in the same order, like a grizzled veteran comic at a down-market Vegas casino.

But the robot’s act is more human than it might first appear. Jon is learning how to respond to its audience—it can now vary the timing of its delivery based on the length of the audience’s laughter, and append different responses to jokes based on the level of noise in the room. It can deliver one line if a joke gets a roar of laughter (“Please tell the booking agents how funny that joke was”) and another if there are crickets (“Sorry about that. I think I got caught in a loop. Please tell the booking agents that you like me … that you like me … that you like me”).

The prospect of an AI that understands why we are laughing, and that can generate its own genuinely funny material, is sort of a holy grail for a subset of AI researchers. Artificial intelligence can diagnose tumors, read maps and play games, often faster and with more accuracy than humans can.
And remember my friend, future events such as these will affect you in the future
User avatar
caltrek
Posts: 6509
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: AI & Robotics News and Discussions

Post by caltrek »

The Steep Cost of Capture
by Meredith Whittaker

https://mags.acm.org/interactions/novem ... Id1742681

Introduction:
(Association for Computer Machinery) This is a perilous moment. Private computational systems marketed as artificial intelligence (AI) are threading through our public life and institutions, concentrating industrial power, compounding marginalization, and quietly shaping access to resources and information.

In considering how to tackle this onslaught of industrial AI, we must first recognize that the “advances” in AI celebrated over the past decade were not due to fundamental scientific breakthroughs in AI techniques. They were and are primarily the product of significantly concentrated data and compute resources that reside in the hands of a few large tech corporations. Modern AI is fundamentally dependent on corporate resources and business practices, and our increasing reliance on such AI cedes inordinate power over our lives and institutions to a handful of tech firms. It also gives these firms significant influence over both the direction of AI development and the academic institutions wishing to research it. Meaning that tech firms are startlingly well positioned to shape what we do—and do not—know about AI and the business behind it, at the same time that their AI products are working to shape our lives and institutions.

Examining the history of the U.S. military’s influence over scientific research during the Cold War, we see parallels to the tech industry’s current influence over AI. This history also offers alarming examples of the way in which U.S. military dominance worked to shape academic knowledge production, and to punish those who dissented.

Today, the tech industry is facing mounting regulatory pressure, and is increasing its efforts to create tech-positive narratives and to silence and sideline critics in much the same way the U.S. military and its allies did in the past. Taken as a whole, we see that the tech industry’s dominance in AI research and knowledge production puts critical researchers and advocates within, and beyond, academia in a treacherous position. This threatens to deprive frontline communities, policymakers, and the public of vital knowledge about the costs and consequences of AI and the industry responsible for it—right at the time that this work is most needed.
Don't mourn, organize.

-Joe Hill
User avatar
Yuli Ban
Posts: 4631
Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 4:44 pm

Re: AI & Robotics News and Discussions

Post by Yuli Ban »

And remember my friend, future events such as these will affect you in the future
User avatar
Lurking
Posts: 108
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 3:26 am
Location: Internet Antiquarian

Re: AI & Robotics News and Discussions

Post by Lurking »

Lurking wrote: Wed Dec 29, 2021 5:50 am
Yuli Ban wrote: Mon Dec 27, 2021 2:47 am Image
It seems to be a joke
Xyls wrote: Fri Jan 07, 2022 9:36 pm I think it is "safe" to say that this post aged like spoiled milk.
Internet used to be an escape from the real world.
Now the real world is an escape from internet.
User avatar
Ozzie guy
Posts: 486
Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 4:40 pm

Re: AI & Robotics News and Discussions

Post by Ozzie guy »

I checked out a cold fusion video on Ameca from a month ago.

Unfortunately from my understanding it lacks the AI ability to communicate and a human is telling it what to say.

It may be much dumber than we think.
weatheriscool
Posts: 12971
Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 6:16 pm

Re: AI & Robotics News and Discussions

Post by weatheriscool »

A new framework that could simplify imitation learning in robotics
https://techxplore.com/news/2022-01-fra ... otics.html
by Ingrid Fadelli , Tech Xplore

Over the past few decades, computer scientists have been trying to train robots to tackle a variety of tasks, including house chores and manufacturing processes. One of the most renowned strategies used to train robots on manual tasks is imitation learning.

As suggested by its name, imitation learning entails teaching a robot how to do something using human demonstrations. While in some studies this training strategy achieved very promising results, it often requires large and annotated datasets containing hundreds of videos where humans complete a given task.

Researchers at New York University have recently developed VINN, an alternative imitation learning framework that does not necessarily require large training datasets. This new approach, presented in a paper pre-published on arXiv, works by decoupling two different aspects of imitation learning, namely learning a task's visual representations and the associated actions.

"I was interested in seeing how we can simplify imitation learning," Jyo Pari, one of the researchers who carried out the study, told TechXplore. "Imitation learning requires two fundamental components; one is learning what is relevant in your scene and the other is how you can take the relevant features to perform a task. We wanted to decouple these components, which are traditionally coupled into one system, and understand the role and importance of each of them."
User avatar
Yuli Ban
Posts: 4631
Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 4:44 pm

Re: AI & Robotics News and Discussions

Post by Yuli Ban »

As the hospitality industry continues to experience major staffing shortages, one restaurant is attempting to continue serving customers in a creative way.

Eat District in Boca Raton, Florida, recently introduced a new server named Bella. Developed by Pudu Robotics, she is touted as providing "an unprecedented food delivery robot experience." She debuted this week to Eat District patrons, who reportedly loved the new waiter.

"I thought that was really cool how the robot served the food," one patron told local news station WPBF 25. Another commented on how the robot was able to efficiently deliver food to their table without error.

Bella costs between $10,000 and $20,000 and is one of several similar robots made by Pudu Products.
And remember my friend, future events such as these will affect you in the future
User avatar
Ozzie guy
Posts: 486
Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 4:40 pm

Re: AI & Robotics News and Discussions

Post by Ozzie guy »

Moores law is slow compared to alot of AI predictions and if anything I would assume AI develops slower than moores law so I think most AI predictions are unfortunately overly optimistic. I will still give tiny weight to Dr_singularity and massive weight to Yuli Ban, Ray Kurzweil and starspawn0. For example at moores laws rates AI will be less than 3 times better by the start of 2025 (probably about 2.75 times) and a tini bit under 16 times better by the start of 2030 and we are doubling something that is very small/weak.
User avatar
Yuli Ban
Posts: 4631
Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 4:44 pm

Re: AI & Robotics News and Discussions

Post by Yuli Ban »

The pursuit of perfect poker goes back at least as far as the 1944 publication of “Theory of Games and Economic Behavior,” by the mathematician John von Neumann and the economist Oskar Morgenstern. The two men wanted to correct what they saw as a fundamental imprecision in the field of economics. “We wish,” they wrote, “to find the mathematically complete principles which define ‘rational behavior’ for the participants in a social economy, and to derive from them the general characteristics of that behavior.” Economic life, they suggested, should be thought of as a series of maximization problems in which individual actors compete to wring as much utility as possible from their daily toil. If von Neumann and Morgenstern could quantify the way good decisions were made, the idea went, they would then be able to build a science of economics on firm ground.

It was this desire to model economic decision-making that led them to game play. Von Neumann rejected most games as unsuitable to the task, especially those like checkers or chess in which both players can see all the pieces on the board and share the same information. “Real life is not like that,” he explained to Jacob Bronowski, a fellow mathematician. “Real life consists of bluffing, of little tactics of deception, of asking yourself what is the other man going to think I mean to do. And that is what games are about in my theory.” Real life, von Neumann thought, was like poker.

“Theory of Games” pointed the way to a future in which all manner of competitive interactions could be modeled mathematically: auctions, submarine warfare, even the way species compete to pass their genes on to future generations. But in strategic terms, poker itself barely advanced in response to von Neumann’s proof until it was taken up by members of the Department of Computing Science at the University of Alberta more than five decades later. The early star of the department’s games research was a professor named Jonathan Schaeffer, who, after 18 years of work, discovered the solution to checkers. Alberta faculty and students also made significant progress on games as diverse as go, Othello, StarCraft and the Canadian pastime of curling. Poker, though, remained a particularly thorny problem, for precisely the reason von Neumann was attracted to it in the first place: the way hidden information in the game acts as an impediment to good decision making.
And remember my friend, future events such as these will affect you in the future
Post Reply