Why not use a server to heat the water in your house?

Post Reply
User avatar
funkervogt
Posts: 1178
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 3:03 pm

Why not use a server to heat the water in your house?

Post by funkervogt »

Next to the boiler is a computer tagged with a sticker that reads: “This powerful computer server is transferring the heat from its processing into the water in your cylinder.” A green LED light indicates that the boiler is running, Jordan explains. “The machine receives the data and processes it. Thus we are able to transfer the equivalent of 4.8 kilowatt-hours of hot water, about the daily amount used by an average family.”

When you sign up with Heata, it places a server in your home, where it connects via your Wi-Fi network to similar servers in other homes—all of which process data from companies that pay it for cloud computing services. Each server prevents one ton of carbon dioxide equivalent per year from being emitted and saves homeowners an average of £250 on hot water annually, a considerable discount in a region where 13% of the inhabitants struggle to afford heat. The Heata trial, funded by a grant from Innovate UK, a national government agency, has been active in Surrey County for more than a year. To date, 80 units have been installed, and another 30 are slated to have a boiler to heat by the end of October.
https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/0 ... aste-heat/

Imagine a much bigger version of this, wherein computer server buildings are erected along the banks of a river in Alaska, northern Canada, or northern Russia. Cold water from the rivers would be diverted into the buildings to cool the servers, and the hot effluent water would be ejected back into the rivers. This would raise the temperature, unfreezing the rivers year round and making them navigable for boats. Soils throughout the river basin would also slowly dry out over several years (ice dams downstream cause water drainage backups), making the region suitable for more plant growth and killing off the huge mosquito swarms that plague the summers.
User avatar
funkervogt
Posts: 1178
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 3:03 pm

Re: Why not use a server to heat the water in your house?

Post by funkervogt »

Bitcoin mining servers can also be used as home heaters.
https://hackaday.com/2023/05/13/home-he ... eal-thing/
MaruisL
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2022 7:18 pm

Re: Why not use a server to heat the water in your house?

Post by MaruisL »

funkervogt wrote: Sun Oct 08, 2023 11:29 pm
Next to the boiler is a computer tagged with a sticker that reads: “This powerful computer server is transferring the heat from its processing into the water in your cylinder.” A green LED light indicates that the boiler is running, Jordan explains. “The machine receives the data and processes it. Thus we are able to transfer the equivalent of 4.8 kilowatt-hours of hot water, about the daily amount used by an average family.”

When you sign up with Heata, it places a server in your home, where it connects via your Wi-Fi network to similar servers in other homes—all of which process data from companies that pay it for cloud computing services. Each server prevents one ton of carbon dioxide equivalent per year from being emitted and saves homeowners an average of £250 on hot water annually, a considerable discount in a region where 13% of the inhabitants struggle to afford heat. The Heata trial, funded by a grant from Innovate UK, a national government agency, has been active in Surrey County for more than a year. To date, 80 units have been installed, and another 30 are slated to have a boiler to heat by the end of October.
https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/0 ... aste-heat/

Imagine a much bigger version of this, wherein computer server buildings are erected along the banks of a river in Alaska, northern Canada, or northern Russia. Cold water from the rivers would be diverted into the buildings to cool the servers, and the hot effluent water would be ejected back into the rivers. This would raise the temperature, unfreezing the rivers year round and making them navigable for boats. Soils throughout the river basin would also slowly dry out over several years (ice dams downstream cause water drainage backups), making the region suitable for more plant growth and killing off the huge mosquito swarms that plague the summers.
:shock: something new for me. not so familiar with bitcoin miners
User avatar
funkervogt
Posts: 1178
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 3:03 pm

Re: Why not use a server to heat the water in your house?

Post by funkervogt »

To elaborate on the idea, heat generated by the servers would first be shunted into a district heating network to heat nearby support buildings and worker housing. The remainder would be pumped back into the river.

I envision mini towns built around data centers, their accompanying power plants, and incinerators for burning each town's waste and generating more heat for productive reuse. Towns located in wooded areas would derive energy from logging and burning the wood in their incinerators. The removal of dead wood and excess trees from around those towns would also make them less vulnerable to wildfires.

Imagine the Ob River studded with mini towns like that from Mongolia to the Arctic Ocean, each an outpost of AGI in the most extreme wilderness. Barges plying the Ob would be the only links to the outside world for those in the towns.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_r ... rivers.png
Post Reply