Climate Change News & Discussions

User avatar
caltrek
Posts: 6509
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: Climate Change News & Discussions

Post by caltrek »

R8Z wrote: Mon Feb 21, 2022 1:39 pm
wjfox wrote: Sat Feb 19, 2022 8:50 pmI've debated with climate science deniers like yourself for many years now [...]
Look, maybe let's lower the weapons down and set the premises first so that we can debate without name calling each other:
  1. You're correct, climate is changing (that's ok) BUT it's changing faster than we would expect (not ok);
  2. Most probably we've caused this increase in the rate of change for the climate and CO2 is big factor in that (not that it matters that 99% whatever agree)
  3. Most of the data we've had for climate predictions were junk (non-homogeneous, bad accuracy, tampered datasets) as it wasn't made for climate prediction but actually for weather. The data is still good enough on average to assess the above two points; it's not that the models aren't good, it's just that "junk in, junk out". We're getting better in this within the past few years (e.g. we ain't predicting global cooling anymore).
  4. Climate alarmism in the main-stream media continues to fuel divisive narratives while advocating for things like "less energy usage" and diminishing the quality of life for the average citizen to solve the climate. This won't do shit as the problem isn't even on the average joe. Whoever has done their reading knows that it rhymes perfectly with same alarmism that has been proven wrong time and time again.
  5. Science and technology has solved the above (food shortages) and will solve climate problems once there is enough reason and feasibility to do so.
Did I miss anything? What am I a denier of? :)
Your citation does not apply. The argument is that 99.9% of climate scientists agree. These are people with expertise in the subject matter. So it is not just a “majority of the people agree.” It is that an overwhelming number of the experts who, having reviewed a vast amount of evidence available in their field, have all reached a broad agreement. Expert opinion is, among other things, admissible as evidence in a court of law.
same alarmism (a link discussing Malthusianism).

6. Science and technology has solved the above (food shortages) and will solve climate problems once there is enough reason and feasibility to do so.
I am not sure what planet you are living on to come to that conclusion, but there are all sorts of studies indicating 1) that the problem of food shortages has not been resolved, and 2) that climate change will worsen the problem, and 3) that existing technology is not and will not be enough to overcome the shortage problem, at least not in the short and medium run when many will suffer the consequences.

Consider these citations of studies on this topic. The first comes from an article already cited in this thread.
The forthcoming report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, obtained by AFP, offers a distressing vision of the decades to come.
Policy choices made now, such as promoting plant-based diets, can limit these health consequences, but many are unavoidable in the short term, the report says.
It warns of the cascading impacts that simultaneous crop failures, soaring inflation and the falling nutritional value of basic foods are likely to have on the world’s most vulnerable people
….
It predicts that up to 80 million more people than today will be at risk of hunger by 2050 and that disruptions to the water cycle will cause rain-fed staple crops to decline throughout sub-Saharan Africa.
Source: Eighty million more to starve: leaked U ... lnews.com)

More on conclusions of the IPCC:
Observed climate change is already affecting food security through increasing temperatures, changing precipitation patterns, and greater frequency of some extreme events (high confidence)

Food security will be increasingly affected by projected future climate change (high confidence).

Vulnerability of pastoral systems to climate change is very high (high confidence).
https://www.ipcc.ch/srccl/chapter/chapter-5/

Here is a United Nations report that starts with a citation of the IPCC:
In the next 30 years, food supply and food security will be severely threatened if little or no action is taken to address climate change and the food system's vulnerability to climate change. According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the extent of climate change impacts on individual regions will vary over time, and different societal and environmental systems will have varied abilities to mitigate or adapt to change.
From Concern USA:
Since the early 1990s, the number of extreme weather-related disasters has doubled. This has reduced the yields of major crops and contributed to an increase in food prices and a decrease in income.

These disasters have also disproportionately harmed low-income people and their access to food, which is why we have chosen to focus on the connection between climate change and food security in the 2019 Global Hunger Index (GHI), prepared by Concern Worldwide and Welthungerhilfe. Sadly, this is not a trend that appears to be going away any time soon. Looking ahead, climate models predict higher average temperatures in most land and ocean regions, hotter extremes in many inhabited regions, and both heavy precipitation and an increasing probability of drought in some areas. These are all additional challenges for reducing hunger.
https://www.concernusa.org/story/climat ... 20systems.

The United States Department of Agriculture:
Climate change is likely to diminish continued progress on global food security through production disruptions that lead to local availability limitations and price increases, interrupted transport conduits, and diminished food safety, among other causes.
https://www.usda.gov/oce/energy-and-env ... d-security

The Global Hunger Index:
Previously on the decline, the number of hungry people has been rising since 2015, a shift that the Food and Agriculture Organization has attributed to persistent instability in conflict-ridden regions, economic slowdowns in more peaceful regions, and adverse climate events (FAO 2018b).

Food production is likely to fall in response to higher temperatures, water scarcity, greater CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere, and extreme events such as heat waves, droughts, and floods. Already, yields of major food crops such as maize and wheat are declining owing to extreme events, epidemics of plant diseases, and declining water resources. In semi-arid regions, 80 percent or more of year-to-year variation in cereal production can be attributed to climate variability (FAO et al. 2018). In Africa, the relationship between production and various aspects of climate, such as rainfall patterns or temperature, is much more complex, showing high regional variation and demanding location-specific adaptation measures.
Sea-level rise poses a particular risk to food security on small islands, in low-lying coastal areas, and in river deltas. Not only are large populations exposed, but given the high productivity of deltas, such as the Mekong Delta, which accounts for 50 percent of Viet Nam’s national rice production, any change in production patterns would have a substantial impact on food availability and the national economy (Gommes et al. 1998).
https://www.globalhungerindex.org/issue ... /2019.html

The Center for Strategic and International Studies:
The impacts of climate change threaten a complex global food system that is already struggling to meet the needs of a growing and changing population. After great progress over the last decade, the number of chronically hungry people around the world has grown in each of the last three years. Today, 821 million people—one in nine—are undernourished. These people experience a shortage of food each day, while over twice that number face moderate food insecurity and frequently compromise on the quality or quantity of food they consume.

Slow economic recovery from the 2008 global financial crisis (and food price spikes) and the increasing frequency and magnitude of climate-related extreme events have helped reverse years of progress fighting global hunger.
https://www.csis.org/analysis/climate-c ... gile-world

Concern Worldwide U.S.:
Since the early 1990s, the number of extreme weather-related disasters has doubled. This has reduced the yields of major crops and contributed to an increase in food prices and a decrease in income.

These disasters have also disproportionately harmed low-income people and their access to food, which is why we have chosen to focus on the connection between climate change and food security in the 2019 Global Hunger Index (GHI), prepared by Concern Worldwide and Welthungerhilfe. Sadly, this is not a trend that appears to be going away any time soon. Looking ahead, climate models predict higher average temperatures in most land and ocean regions, hotter extremes in many inhabited regions, and both heavy precipitation and an increasing probability of drought in some areas. These are all additional challenges for reducing hunger.
How climate change threatens food secur ... rnusa.org)
Don't mourn, organize.

-Joe Hill
User avatar
wjfox
Site Admin
Posts: 8730
Joined: Sat May 15, 2021 6:09 pm
Location: London, UK
Contact:

Re: Climate Change News & Discussions

Post by wjfox »

R8Z wrote: Mon Feb 21, 2022 1:39 pm Most of the data we've had for climate predictions were junk (non-homogeneous, bad accuracy, tampered datasets)
Why would you accept that obscure, anonymous blog as a credible source? I can't find any reference to this "Global Climate Change Organization" elsewhere. It doesn't even provide any contact or other details, just an email. This is why I say you need to improve your critical thinking skills.

As for "tampered" datasets – this is completely routine in all areas of science. The raw data is adjusted to correct for known biases:

https://climate.nasa.gov/ask-nasa-clima ... ket_mylist

Climate models are accurate (again, this is from NASA):

https://climate.nasa.gov/news/2943/stud ... ons-right/

R8Z wrote: Mon Feb 21, 2022 1:39 pmClimate alarmism in the main-stream media continues to fuel divisive narratives
Yeah, well "mainstream media" is not the same as "dispassionate, objective, peer-reviewed studies in thousands of academic journals."

R8Z wrote: Mon Feb 21, 2022 1:39 pm while advocating for things like "less energy usage"
Is that even a bad thing? Better insulated homes can save tons of money, for example. Office lights that automatically switch off when there's nobody around can save money, and perhaps reduce light pollution too. All sorts of devices, vehicles, and other technologies can be made more efficient.

R8Z wrote: Mon Feb 21, 2022 1:39 pm diminishing the quality of life for the average citizen
Not at all. Air pollution is a gigantic health problem that kills 7-8 million each year, and is responsible for a whole array of other societal issues, e.g. birth defects, mental health issues, biodiversity loss. In some countries, the economic impacts account for several percentage points in lost GDP.

Localised and decentralised solar/wind can also improve quality of life by democratising energy for people and communities. In Africa, it means you don't need to spend money on expensive grid infrastructure.

In the longer term, renewables can help us move away from finite energy sources, and reduce dependence on hostile foreign regimes.

Other clean tech can improve quality of life, e.g. electric cars will soon be cheaper than ICE cars, and as well as reducing pollution they are generally cheaper to maintain and will last longer too.

R8Z wrote: Mon Feb 21, 2022 1:39 pm the problem isn't even on the average joe.
Well, we agree on something here. Surely the solution is to end the vast subsidies we pour into the fossil fuel industry each year ($0.5 trillion according to one estimate), alongside better environmental regulations, and other incentives to transition away from fossil fuels.

R8Z wrote: Mon Feb 21, 2022 1:39 pm Whoever has done their reading knows that it rhymes perfectly with same alarmism that has been proven wrong time and time again. Science and technology has solved the above (food shortages) and will solve climate problems once there is enough reason and feasibility to do so.
I refer you to caltrek's excellent list of citations.

Just because there hasn't been a major population die-off, doesn't mean it can't happen in the future. We're a global species now, with global impacts – and without action to drastically reduce our greenhouse gas emissions, the impacts of climate change will be severe.

Less so for richer countries, but many poorer parts of the world could see widespread famine, loss of habitable land, conflict and upheaval. This will spill over into the richer countries, with huge refugee movements. And many will (perhaps rightfully) blame us, and become radicalised against the West. Some recent conflicts in the Middle East and Africa have already been attributed to worsening climate change. The number of climate disasters continues to increase decade after decade – that clearly isn't sustainable.

R8Z wrote: Mon Feb 21, 2022 1:39 pm Did I miss anything? What am I a denier of? :)
You dismissed 99.9% of peer-reviewed studies by experts in climate science, published in leading academic journals, including the likes of Nature. Instead you prefer to trust a few paragraphs from some obscure, anonymous blog, which apparently is all it takes to convince you.

Imagine if we did the same for other areas of science, without questioning the credibility of sources. We'd end up being flat-earthers, deniers of the germ theory of disease, blaming the Gods for earthquakes and thunder, denying the link between smoking and lung cancer, etc.

It's okay to change your mind, you know:-

"Okay - thanks, Will. You've given me a few things to ponder there."

But no, as is usually the case with climate skeptics, I fully expect you to double-down on your denial.

What would it take to convince you?
weatheriscool
Posts: 12946
Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 6:16 pm

Re: Climate Change News & Discussions

Post by weatheriscool »

Global warming is amplifying our water cycle—and it's happening much faster than we expected
https://phys.org/news/2022-02-global-am ... aster.html
by University of New South Wales

The global water cycle—that is, the constant movement of freshwater between the clouds, land and the ocean—plays an important role in our daily lives. This delicate system transports water from the ocean to the land, helping to make our environment habitable and soil fertile.

But rising global temperatures have been making this system more extreme: water is moving away from dry regions towards wet regions, causing droughts to worsen in parts of the globe, while intensifying rainfall events and flooding in others. In other words, wet areas are getting wetter, and dry areas are getting drier.

Up until now, changes to the cycle have been difficult to directly observe, with around 80 percent of global rainfall and evaporation happening over the ocean.

But a new UNSW-led study, published today in Nature, has used changing patterns of salt in the ocean to estimate how much ocean freshwater has moved from the equator to the poles since 1970. The findings show that between two and four times more freshwater has moved than climate models anticipated—giving us insights about how the global water cycle is amplifying as a whole.
weatheriscool
Posts: 12946
Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 6:16 pm

Re: Climate Change News & Discussions

Post by weatheriscool »

Global warming suppresses shrub recruitment in Arctic and Tibet
https://phys.org/news/2022-02-global-su ... tibet.html
by Li Yuan, Chinese Academy of Sciences
A new study led by Prof. Liang Eryuan from the Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research (ITP) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) shows that global warming has suppressed shrub recruitment in Greenland and the Tibetan Plateau.

This paper was published in PNAS on Feb. 21.

Scientists assume that warming-triggered tipping points related to cold biomes are very likely to occur in the Arctic Region, such as Greenland, and alpine regions in the Tibetan Plateau. The two regions are characterized by similar cold-adapted shrubs.

Shrub recruitment, a key component of vegetation dynamics beyond forests, is a highly sensitive indicator of climate and environmental change. It can act as an indicator of the tipping point of cold biomes.

The research team, from ITP/CAS, the University of Arizona, Instituto Pirenaico de Ecología (IPE-CSIC), and the University of Cambridge, used two long-term shrub recruitment datasets of 2,770 samples from the Tibetan Plateau and Greenland dating back to 1871 to identify trends in shrub recruitment.
weatheriscool
Posts: 12946
Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 6:16 pm

Re: Climate Change News & Discussions

Post by weatheriscool »

Climate change drives rise in extreme lake water temperatures
https://phys.org/news/2022-02-climate-e ... tures.html
by American Geophysical Union
The world's largest lakes are hit by severe lake heat waves—when water temperatures soar far above normal—six times as frequently as they were about two decades ago, according to a new study. Nearly all severe lake heat waves occurring over the past 20 years were due in some part to climate change, and could become between three and 25 times more likely by the end of the century, according to the new research.

A new study analyzed over two decades of surface temperature data from the world's largest lakes to find out how frequently lake heat waves occur and modeled how much anthropogenic climate change has contributed to their occurrence.

Researchers found severe lake heat waves are twice as likely to occur, on average, as they were during a pre-industrial climate. Lake heat waves can change water conditions, stress aquatic plants and animals, and lead to algae blooms and other water quality issues.

The study was published in the AGU journal Geophysical Research Letters. The study is the first to quantify how anthropogenic (human-induced) climate change has influenced lake heat waves, offering a critical new perspective on one way the world's lakes are responding to the warming climate.
User avatar
caltrek
Posts: 6509
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: Climate Change News & Discussions

Post by caltrek »

Taking Climate Action Now Can Secure Our Future
February 28, 2022

https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/944837

Inroduction:
(EurekAlert) Human-induced climate change is causing dangerous and widespread disruption in nature and affecting the lives of billions of people around the world, despite efforts to reduce the risks. People and ecosystems least able to cope are being hardest hit, according to the latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report, released today.

The IPCC Working Group II report examines the impacts of climate change on nature and people around the globe. It explores future impacts at different levels of warming and the resulting risks, and offers options to strengthen nature and society’s resilience to ongoing climate change; to fight hunger, poverty, and inequality; and to ensure that Earth remains a place worth living on for current as well as for future generations.

The report introduces several new components: One is a special section on climate change impacts, risks and options to act for cities and settlements by the sea, tropical forests, mountains, biodiversity hotspots, dryland and deserts, the Mediterranean, as well as the Polar Regions. Another is an atlas that will present data and findings on observed and projected climate change impacts and risks from global to regional scales, thus offering even more insights for decision makers.

“This report is a dire warning about the consequences of inaction,” said Hoesung Lee, Chair of the IPCC. “It shows that climate change is a grave and mounting threat to our wellbeing and a healthy planet. Our actions today will shape how people adapt and how nature responds to increasing climate risks.”

IIASA Systemic Risk and Resilience Research Group Leader, Reinhard Mechler, is a lead author on Chapter 17 of the report, which focuses on decision-making options for managing risk. Mechler, whose work for the IPCC focusses on how climate risk management and adaptation help to reduce and address the risks to society and ecosystems across the globe, also contributed to the summary for policymakers, which was approved by 195 member governments of the IPCC on Sunday, 27 February 2022, through a virtual approval session held over two weeks. His work includes assessments of methods and tools to support planning and implementation, governance issues, and the international dimension with regard to policy dialogue on adaptation and Loss and Damage.
Don't mourn, organize.

-Joe Hill
weatheriscool
Posts: 12946
Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 6:16 pm

Re: Climate Change News & Discussions

Post by weatheriscool »

Satellite data analysis suggests Amazon rainforest is losing resilience
https://phys.org/news/2022-03-satellite ... ience.html
by Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
The Amazon rainforest is likely losing resilience, data analysis from high-resolution satellite images suggests. This is due to stress from a combination of logging and burning—the influence of human-caused climate change is not clearly determinable so far, but will likely matter greatly in the future. For about three-quarters of the forest, the ability to recover from perturbation has been decreasing since the early 2000s, which scientists see as a warning sign. The new evidence is derived from advanced statistical analysis of satellite data of changes in vegetation biomass and productivity.

"Reduced resilience—the ability to recover from perturbations like droughts or fires—can mean an increased risk of dieback of the Amazon rainforest. That we see such a resilience loss in observations is worrying," says Niklas Boers from the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research and the Technical University of Munich, who conducted the study jointly with researchers from the University of Exeter, UK.

"The Amazon rainforest is home to a unique host of biodiversity, strongly influences rainfall all over South America by way of its enormous evapotranspiration, and stores huge amounts of carbon that could be released as greenhouse gases in the case of even partial dieback, in turn contributing to further global warming," Boers explains. "This is why the rainforest is of global relevance."
User avatar
R8Z
Posts: 267
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2021 6:25 pm
Location: Remote

Re: Climate Change News & Discussions

Post by R8Z »

caltrek wrote: Tue Feb 22, 2022 1:22 am [...]
wjfox wrote: Tue Feb 22, 2022 9:29 am What would it take to convince you?
Maybe I was too harsh to jump on this discussion with empty hands and got the response I deserved. I am very convinced on most points you've sourced. On some which I still have some doubts I think are now irrelevant to the discussion.

After a few days of reflection I think I can summarize my perspective in the following way (again but now shorter):

1. Climate change is real and we're to blame;
2. There are things we can do to diminish the damage and maybe, if we rush, to reverse the trend;

But here's the question:

How can we do this without hurting or diminishing the quality of life of anyone? How can we achieve this change with the most self-consciousness and voluntary manner from the participants?

Personally I am fan of products and services with "cause" labels but I am not sure if there's anything going for in this area (I only know of a few companies that foot their carbon footprint, but carbon isn't the only problem as we know). For example, I usually buy produce with "organic/bio" labels even if paying slightly higher price.
And, as always, bye bye.
User avatar
raklian
Posts: 1747
Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 4:46 pm
Location: North Carolina

Re: Climate Change News & Discussions

Post by raklian »

To know is essentially the same as not knowing. The only thing that occurs is the rearrangement of atoms in your brain.
User avatar
caltrek
Posts: 6509
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: Climate Change News & Discussions

Post by caltrek »

Storms and Sea Level Rise Could Cost Ports Billions
by Justine Calma
March 16, 2022

https://www.theverge.com/2022/3/16/2298 ... ate-change

Introduction:
(The Verge) Ports around the world stand to suffer billions of dollars in losses if greenhouse gas emissions continue to grow, a new report finds. Extreme weather, flooding, and rising sea levels would all damage vital seaport infrastructure, disrupting global supply lines.

Losses from storms and climate-related port disruptions could near $10 billion a year by 2050, according to the report, commissioned by the nonprofit Environmental Defense Fund (EDF). By 2100, without action on climate change, those costs could balloon to more than $25 billion a year. For context, that last figure is more than the total operating profits for the entire global container shipping industry in a year.

Many ports are already overwhelmed after the COVID-19 pandemic exposed weaknesses in global supply chains. Now, ports and the shipping industry have a lot of work ahead of them to cut down their own planet-heating pollution and avoid the worst-case scenarios outlined in the report, its authors warn.

“Just as the COVID-19 pandemic threw our ports and the global supply chain into crisis mode, the climate emergency will have major consequences for international shipping,” Marie Hubatova, senior manager of EDF’s global transport team, said in a press release. “In the face of climate breakdown, however, the shipping industry has an early warning bell and an opportunity to act.”

Severe storms are one of the biggest threats outlined in the report, particularly when stormwaters mangle infrastructure and vessels. The damage they do to ports accounts for the majority of the losses forecasted in the report. Evidence is piling up that tropical cyclones are becoming more intense in a warming world. That means more rainfall and even stronger hurricane-force winds. Then there are rising sea levels: when sea levels are higher, destructive waves and storm surges are bigger.
Don't mourn, organize.

-Joe Hill
Post Reply