Ukraine War Watch Thread

User avatar
raklian
Posts: 1772
Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 4:46 pm
Location: North Carolina

Re: Ukraine War Watch Thread

Post by raklian »

firestar464 wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 4:52 pm Biden has violated both international and domestic law
What international and domestic laws has Biden broken? The ban on the use of cluster munitions has more to do with voluntarily signing the Convention on Cluster Munitions treaty which is not the same as a law. Neither Russia nor U.S. are signatories to this treaty.
To know is essentially the same as not knowing. The only thing that occurs is the rearrangement of atoms in your brain.
User avatar
Powers
Posts: 785
Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2023 7:32 pm
Location: a.k.a Lurking, Member, Lorem Ipsum, ..., --- and ººº.

Re: Ukraine War Watch Thread

Post by Powers »

caltrek wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 2:30 pm caltrek’s comment: We are losing the war in that we are becoming more and more like what we started out fighting against.
Not the first time.
firestar464
Posts: 1008
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2022 7:45 am

Re: Ukraine War Watch Thread

Post by firestar464 »

raklian wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 5:46 pm
firestar464 wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 4:52 pm Biden has violated both international and domestic law
What international and domestic laws has Biden broken? The ban on the use of cluster munitions has more to do with voluntarily signing the Convention on Cluster Munitions treaty which is not the same as a law. Neither Russia nor U.S. are signatories to this treaty.
From the article by Common Dreams:

In order to deliver the weapons to Ukraine, the Post noted, Biden is trampling on "U.S. law prohibiting the production, use, or transfer of cluster munitions with a failure rate of more than 1%."
User avatar
raklian
Posts: 1772
Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 4:46 pm
Location: North Carolina

Re: Ukraine War Watch Thread

Post by raklian »

firestar464 wrote: Sat Jul 08, 2023 1:12 am
raklian wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 5:46 pm
firestar464 wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 4:52 pm Biden has violated both international and domestic law
What international and domestic laws has Biden broken? The ban on the use of cluster munitions has more to do with voluntarily signing the Convention on Cluster Munitions treaty which is not the same as a law. Neither Russia nor U.S. are signatories to this treaty.
From the article by Common Dreams:

In order to deliver the weapons to Ukraine, the Post noted, Biden is trampling on "U.S. law prohibiting the production, use, or transfer of cluster munitions with a failure rate of more than 1%."
Yes, there is a law like that but just because they're now sending cluster munitions doesn't automatically mean they're breaking that law. The article is an opinion piece written by someone who is biased against cluster munitions in general, nothing more. The U.S. military did in fact emphasize they're only sending a variant of cluster munitions that have a very low dud rate of ~2% so it's not exactly as if they're blatantly violating their restrictions.
To know is essentially the same as not knowing. The only thing that occurs is the rearrangement of atoms in your brain.
Doozer
Posts: 66
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 1:02 am

Re: Ukraine War Watch Thread

Post by Doozer »

Does anyone else think that Prigozhin has given up and decided to hand himself in to Putin? Why else would he return to Russia?
firestar464
Posts: 1008
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2022 7:45 am

Re: Ukraine War Watch Thread

Post by firestar464 »

He's literally walking into FSB offices to get his stuff back. He's definitely not handing himself in.
weatheriscool
Posts: 14084
Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 6:16 pm

Re: Ukraine War Watch Thread

Post by weatheriscool »

User avatar
caltrek
Posts: 6740
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: Ukraine War Watch Thread

Post by caltrek »

firestar464 wrote: Sat Jul 08, 2023 1:12 am
raklian wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 5:46 pm
firestar464 wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 4:52 pm Biden has violated both international and domestic law
What international and domestic laws has Biden broken? The ban on the use of cluster munitions has more to do with voluntarily signing the Convention on Cluster Munitions treaty which is not the same as a law. Neither Russia nor U.S. are signatories to this treaty.
From the article by Common Dreams:

In order to deliver the weapons to Ukraine, the Post noted, Biden is trampling on "U.S. law prohibiting the production, use, or transfer of cluster munitions with a failure rate of more than 1%."
I hate to undermine a source that I introduced (The Washington Post via Common Dreams) Still, upon further review:
The relevant part of international humanitarian law here is 1977’s Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions, which both Ukraine and Russia have ratified. The additional protocol sets out rules the warring parties must observe to limit harm to civilians. Acknowledging that civilian deaths are an inevitable part of war, Article 51 of Additional Protocol I prohibits “indiscrimate” attacks. Such attacks include those employing a weapon that cannot be directed at a specific military target or of such a nature to strike military targets and civilians and civilian objects without distinction.

Meanwhile, Article 57 of the additional protocol stresses that attacking armies have a duty of care to spare civilian populations. This includes taking “all feasible precautions in the choice of means and method of attack.”

Neither article specifies any weapons deemed off-limits. Rather, it is how the weapons are used that determines whether the attack constitutes an indiscriminate one and hence a crime under international law.
Source https://theconversation.com/there-is-no ... so-207717

The article then seems to note that some advocates argue that cluster bombs are inherently indiscriminate. Yet, a hyperlink related to that observation describes casualties at civilian locations, and not where the targets are military in nature. That hyperlinked article does not appear to make the argument of cluster bombs being inherently indiscriminate.

It should be noted that in 2021, according to Landmines and Cluster Munitions Monitor “Civilians accounted for 97% of all casualties” caused by the use of cluster munitions.

Source: http://www.the-monitor.org/media/33486 ... 2_PPT.pdf

Also of relevance is a Department of Defense Memorandum issued in November 2017. In that Memorandum:

“Cluster munitions that do not meet the standards prescribed by this policy for procuring new munitions will be removed from active inventories and demilitarized after their capabilities have been replaced by sufficient quantities of munitions that meet the standards of this policy.”
"Standards prescribed by this policy" meaning “warheads that do not result in more than one percent unexploded ordnance…”

Source: https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Docu ... 15-17.pdf
Don't mourn, organize.

-Joe Hill
User avatar
caltrek
Posts: 6740
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: Ukraine War Watch Thread

Post by caltrek »

Kakhovka Dam Breach in Ukraine Caused Economic, Agricultural and Ecological Devastation that Will Last for Years
by Susanne Wengle and Vitalii Dankevych
July 7, 2023

Introduction:
(The Conversation) When an explosion breached the Kakhovka Dam in Ukraine on June 6, 2023, much analysis focused on near-term impacts, including the flooding of the city of Kherson, threats to the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant and consequences for Ukrainian military forces’ expected spring offensive against Russian troops.

But the most severe long-term effects will fall on Southeast Ukraine’s farmers.

Villages there were flooded. Roads, train tracks and irrigation canals were washed away. Crops in fields and orchards in the Kherson and Zaporizhzhia region were inundated, then left to shrivel after the water drained.

The long-term ecological disaster will unfold over decades to come. Crimea, once a region known for its sunny beaches and rice fields, could dry up without irrigation.
Read more here: https://theconversation.com/kakhovka-d ... s-208629
Don't mourn, organize.

-Joe Hill
weatheriscool
Posts: 14084
Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 6:16 pm

Re: Ukraine War Watch Thread

Post by weatheriscool »

Trump says he can end war in 24 hours; Zelenskyy says Biden could in 5 minutes
Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on Sunday dismissed claims by Donald Trump that he could end the war in 24 hours, saying the current GOP presidential front-runner failed to do so while president.

Zelenskyy, speaking through a translator on ABC’s “This Week," noted that Ukraine has been battling Russian proxies in the Donbas region since Russia seized Crimea in 2014. Trump served as president from 2016 to 2020.

"The sole desire to bring the war to an end is beautiful, but this desire should be based on some real-life experience," Zelenskyy said. "Donald Trump had already these 24 hours once in his time. We were at war, not a full-scale war. ... (Trump) had that time at his disposal, but he must have had some other priorities."

Trump has claimed to have a close relationship with Russian President Vladimir Putin, but details on his plans to halt the war have been vague. Zelenskyy said that if Trump meant to end the war by forcing Ukraine to cede territory, "President Joe) Biden could have brought it to an end even in five minutes, but we would not agree."
https://www.yahoo.com/news/putins-overw ... 51615.html

We could nuke Moscow!
Post Reply