Ukraine War Watch Thread

User avatar
ibm9000
Posts: 364
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2022 9:24 am

Re: Ukraine War Watch Thread

Post by ibm9000 »

During the Indochina War, US was providing up to 85% of funding.

Iran is providing weapons to Russia. We, are providing weapons to Ukraine.
We don't go around invading every dictatorship in the planet, we don't go around fighting "injustice" in every country, we don't go around providing weapons to every "invaded" country. Our interests are against Russia, the only difference is our own selfishness.

Am I missing something else?
weatheriscool
Posts: 12964
Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 6:16 pm

Re: Ukraine War Watch Thread

Post by weatheriscool »

Russia retaliates with mass missile attack on Ukraine after tanks promise
Source: The Guardian
Huge explosions shook Kyiv and sirens sounded across Ukraine on Thursday morning during a mass missile attack 24 hours after commitments were made by the US and Germany to send advanced battle tanks. There were reports of at least one person killed in the capital, Kyiv.

The Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov has this morning said that Moscow views sending tanks to Ukraine as “direct involvement in the conflict”.

A total of 30 missiles were said to be launched against targets in the war-torn country with Ukraine’s air defences having also shot down 24 Iranian-made Shahed “kamikaze” drones overnight.

“We expect more than 30 missiles, which have already started to appear in various territories,” said Yuriy Ignat, a Ukrainian military spokesperson. “Air defence systems are working.”
Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/202 ... ks-promise
User avatar
ibm9000
Posts: 364
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2022 9:24 am

Re: Ukraine War Watch Thread

Post by ibm9000 »

Wagner is a mercenary group. (I don't disagree).

Blackwater was/is a Charity (American) NGO.
User avatar
wjfox
Site Admin
Posts: 8732
Joined: Sat May 15, 2021 6:09 pm
Location: London, UK
Contact:

Re: Ukraine War Watch Thread

Post by wjfox »

Image
User avatar
ibm9000
Posts: 364
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2022 9:24 am

Re: Ukraine War Watch Thread

Post by ibm9000 »

This stinks like Indochina-Vietnam all over again.

Maybe Boris (Johnson) should be the first to seat before that International Penal Court. It seems that in March, during the negotiations in Turkey, Boris told Ukraine not to sign a peace agreement, peace was not in the interest of US and Europe (debilitating Russia is certainly in US interests).

Someone mention something about Putin not negotiating "in good faith", A. Merkel stated that the whole Minsk II Agreement was to deceive Russia and that we, Western Democracies, never had any intention of implementing it. (A bit like the NI Protocol, by Boris).

Further arms deliveries to Ukraine will “pointlessly prolong the war”, with “more casualties on both sides and the continued destruction of the country”. They would also mean that “we will be drawn even deeper into this war”.
Well, it's winter, a pause, are we encouraging negotiations? or adding fuel to the fire?

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley said both Russia and Ukraine will have to realize that military victory is impossible to achieve and that a negotiated end to the conflict would end the suffering of war.

Harald Kujat, NATO.
Zeitgeschehen im Fokus. Financial Times, Foreign Affairs, Responsible Statecraft and Ukrainska Pravda about the March negotiations.
User avatar
ººº
Posts: 359
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2022 3:54 am

Re: Ukraine War Watch Thread

Post by ººº »

ibm9000 wrote: Sun Jan 29, 2023 3:36 am This stinks like Indochina-Vietnam all over again.

Maybe Boris (Johnson) should be the first to seat before that International Penal Court. It seems that in March, during the negotiations in Turkey, Boris told Ukraine not to sign a peace agreement, peace was not in the interest of US and Europe (debilitating Russia is certainly in US interests).

Someone mention something about Putin not negotiating "in good faith", A. Merkel stated that the whole Minsk II Agreement was to deceive Russia and that we, Western Democracies, never had any intention of implementing it. (A bit like the NI Protocol, by Boris).

Further arms deliveries to Ukraine will “pointlessly prolong the war”, with “more casualties on both sides and the continued destruction of the country”. They would also mean that “we will be drawn even deeper into this war”.
Well, it's winter, a pause, are we encouraging negotiations? or adding fuel to the fire?

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley said both Russia and Ukraine will have to realize that military victory is impossible to achieve and that a negotiated end to the conflict would end the suffering of war.

Harald Kujat, NATO.
Zeitgeschehen im Fokus. Financial Times, Foreign Affairs, Responsible Statecraft and Ukrainska Pravda about the March negotiations.
Russia could still win if Putin really tried (and assumed the consequences of doing so).
User avatar
funkervogt
Posts: 1171
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 3:03 pm

Re: Ukraine War Watch Thread

Post by funkervogt »

Reality check: Russia still has major military and economic advantages over Ukraine. Unless the West continues supplying Ukraine with massive amounts of aid and weapons, the latter will lose a war of attrition with Russia.

User avatar
raklian
Posts: 1747
Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 4:46 pm
Location: North Carolina

Re: Ukraine War Watch Thread

Post by raklian »

funkervogt wrote: Sun Jan 29, 2023 3:08 pm Reality check: Russia still has major military and economic advantages over Ukraine. Unless the West continues supplying Ukraine with massive amounts of aid and weapons, the latter will lose a war of attrition with Russia.
To defeat Ukraine militarily is one thing, but occupying a country that is getting continued support by NATO is a whole another thing. With Ukraine ultimately changing to model that involves mixing guerrilla tactics with conventional warfare, Russia will just continue to hemorrhage soldiers and equipment until it's no longer viable to keep them there. Additionally, the United States and Europe are working behind the scenes to isolate and undermine Russia's economic ability to sustain its offensive. In the off chance Russia starts making meaningful gains, NATO will escalate its support for Ukraine by sending it weapons and intelligence they've been reluctant to give. That's how important this conflict is to NATO - they really do not want Russia establishing a precedent for future scenarios involving other countries. Russia will have a very tough time keeping those gains. No matter how you look at it, Russia just can't win. It's more likely the conflict will end with Russia imploding by its own economic & political crisis, just like it did for the USSR in the early 90s.
To know is essentially the same as not knowing. The only thing that occurs is the rearrangement of atoms in your brain.
User avatar
ibm9000
Posts: 364
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2022 9:24 am

Re: Ukraine War Watch Thread

Post by ibm9000 »

thedrive
About the Abrams... the Leopards the same, but a bit less.

Ukrainian troops “want to press the Russians to secure their terrain,” said Pat Donahoe (retired U.S. Army major general).“That will require the ability to fight through complex defensive areas, breach that and then be able to put a highly maneuverable armored force into the exploitation role through a penetration of those lines.” In sufficient numbers, the Abrams, he said, would be of great value in such an effort. How much difference can be made by 31 such tanks, enough to fill out one Ukrainian tank battalion, remains to be seen.
Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin “has been very focused on … not... providing the Ukrainians a system they can't repair, they can't sustain and they, over the long term, can't afford, because it's not helpful,” said Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Colin Kahl.


To succeed, it has to be part of a larger, combined arms effort that includes artillery, engineering, and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance
elements “that knit together the extreme lethality and ability of a modern armored brigade, armored division concept... and so when you look at what the Ukrainians are asking from us, they are asking to develop mechanized forces on the western model.”

- Or like the Soviet Tank Corps in WW2, already in Ukraine military academies...
To date, one of the key reasons Ukraine has regained so much of the territory it initially lost has been
- Russia abandoning that territory?
its ability to carry out these combined arms maneuvers while Russia has not been able to.
- But for the whole beginning of the war when the Russians were running all over the country.
But “M1 formations require significant logistics capabilities.”
- Like "The dog ate my homework"... before getting any homework.
Abrams package included eight M-88 Hercules recovery vehicles.
- One for every 4 MBT, what kind of offensive is that?
You can have the world’s most superior tank, but if your crew is insufficiently trained, equipped, and logistically supported, then the ‘superior tank’ is worthless.”
- The dog again...
The training for new U.S. Abrams tank crew members is now 22 weeks, where it used to be 17 weeks up until a few years ago, “That is a lot of training and that is just their basic tank training and doesn’t include unit training once they arrive,”
- Meaning platoon, company, battalion and the integration in a brigade.
“You cannot just jump on the tank and go; especially the latest versions.
- Unlike all that overoptimistic tanks-teletransportation-victory.
The tankers equipped with the Abrams, and really any modern main battle tank such as the Leopoard, Leclerc, and Challenger, must go through extensive training both in tactics, vehicle operations, vehicle identification, maneuvers, vehicle capabilities, maintenance procedures, gunnery, etc to be a useful and successful crew. If time and training is not provided to the crews then it doesn’t matter what tank you operate.”
- The captured Iranians Challengers were a lot more effectives in Iraqi hands; maybe, also, because they had free access to spares and manuals.
The M1's turbine engine consumes a massive amount of fuel anytime the engine is running, which would be near continuously. An M-1
formation would require about 300 (like 1.400 ltrs) gallons every eight hours. Its fuel tank holds 500 gallons. Bottom line is that any formation company-sized or larger would require dedicated fuel trucks.The Abrams was designed with the assumption that it would be supported by the massive U.S. logistical tail.
- The perfect weapon... if under perfect conditions: it will be Ukraine's fault.
Keeping a steady supply of repair parts is of vital importance, too. “The M1 engine/ transmission is a complex machine that does not tolerate ‘shade tree’ mechanics. The engine/transmission weighs in at 2,500lb and is difficult to remove and work on. US M1 tank mechanics are well trained and resourced with repair parts and specialized tools.”
- Not like the Ukrainians. First weapons, then logistics and then... we destroy the planet.
“The Ukrainian T-84 weighs in at 46-51 tons; the M1A1 at 63 tons, the weight can be problematic when crossing bridges not designed to sustain that much weight.”
“While the Ukrainian soldiers undoubtedly have combat experience, they likely lack experience maneuvering formations at the company plus level,” referring to company-sized units and larger ones. “This experience is typically built in the U.S. at our maneuver centers. Learning how to maneuver and fight as a formation requires multiple iterations.”

- Meaning in Ukraine manoeuvres were never conducted and their officers only study chess?
The bottom line, is that the Abrams, once employed, “will have an immediate and overwhelming effect at the tactical/single battle level.”
- Or not, if they are that clumsy.
But the “proof of their ‘game-changing’ ability will be in the employment of a combined-arms campaign.” There is also the larger picture question of how Ukrainians will mesh together so many different tanks into a cohesive order of battle.

I just read: Leopards arriving at the end of spring, Abrams in summer.
Is US going to send logistic support?, contractors for maintenance?, advisors? and then troops to protect them?
Vietnamization: I hope US gives them a lot of weapons and then abandon them if the other alternative is WW3.
User avatar
ibm9000
Posts: 364
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2022 9:24 am

Re: Ukraine War Watch Thread

Post by ibm9000 »

Russia could still win if Putin really tried (and assumed the consequences of doing so).
"Win" is going to be a blurry concept. A puppet (not US puppet) regime?, keeping NATO at a safe distance?, Crimea and a sweet peace agreement?, the occupation of the country was never and objective.
One of the consequences is depleted arsenals, only US is posh enough to invade two countries in a row.
Post Reply