Again referring back to thisfunkervogt wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 3:33 pmThis is a very deceptive graphic. Many of the areas with low life expectancies are predominantly black, Hispanic, or Native American, and vote overwhelmingly for the Democrats.
Society & Demographics News and Discussions
-
firestar464
- Posts: 7202
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2022 7:45 am
Re: Society & Demographics News and Discussions
Re: Society & Demographics News and Discussions
Record 3.7m workers in England will have major illness by 2040, study finds
Wed 17 Apr 2024 06.00 BST
A record 3.7 million workers in England will have a major illness by 2040, according to research.
On current trends, 700,000 more working-age adults will be living with high healthcare needs or substantial risk of mortality by 2040 – up nearly 25% from 2019 levels, according to a report by the Health Foundation charity.
But the authors predicted no improvement in health inequalities for working-age adults by 2040, with 80% of the increase in major illness in more deprived areas.
Researchers at the Health Foundation’s research arm and the University of Liverpool examined 1.7m GP and hospital records, alongside mortality data, which was then linked to geographical data to estimate the difference in diagnosed illness by level of deprivation in England in 2019, the last year of health data before the pandemic.
They then projected how levels of ill health are predicted to change in England between 2019 and 2040 based on trends in risk factors such as smoking, alcohol use, obesity, diet and physical activity, as well as rates of illness, life expectancy and population changes.
Without action, the authors warn, people in the most deprived areas of England are likely to develop a major illness 10 years earlier than those in the least deprived areas and are also three times more likely to die by the age of 70.
https://www.theguardian.com/society/202 ... tudy-finds
Wed 17 Apr 2024 06.00 BST
A record 3.7 million workers in England will have a major illness by 2040, according to research.
On current trends, 700,000 more working-age adults will be living with high healthcare needs or substantial risk of mortality by 2040 – up nearly 25% from 2019 levels, according to a report by the Health Foundation charity.
But the authors predicted no improvement in health inequalities for working-age adults by 2040, with 80% of the increase in major illness in more deprived areas.
Researchers at the Health Foundation’s research arm and the University of Liverpool examined 1.7m GP and hospital records, alongside mortality data, which was then linked to geographical data to estimate the difference in diagnosed illness by level of deprivation in England in 2019, the last year of health data before the pandemic.
They then projected how levels of ill health are predicted to change in England between 2019 and 2040 based on trends in risk factors such as smoking, alcohol use, obesity, diet and physical activity, as well as rates of illness, life expectancy and population changes.
Without action, the authors warn, people in the most deprived areas of England are likely to develop a major illness 10 years earlier than those in the least deprived areas and are also three times more likely to die by the age of 70.
https://www.theguardian.com/society/202 ... tudy-finds
Re: Society & Demographics News and Discussions
When does 'old age' begin? Public perception may be skewing later
April 22, 2024, 10:20 PM GMT+1
How old is considered old?
The answer to that question appears to be changing as people live longer, retire later and maintain higher levels of physical and mental health into their older years.
A study published Monday suggests that people in their mid-60s believe old age starts at 75 — but the older people get, the later they think it begins.
The research, published in the American Psychological Association’s Psychology and Aging journal, examined data from around 14,000 participants in the German Aging Survey, which studies old age as a stage of life in Germany. The participants were born between 1911 and 1974 and entered the survey at ages 40 to 85.
The people studied reported their perceptions of old age up to eight times over 25 years. For every four to five years that passed, participants reported that old age started a year later compared to their last assessment.
https://www.nbcnews.com/health/aging/ho ... rcna148619
April 22, 2024, 10:20 PM GMT+1
How old is considered old?
The answer to that question appears to be changing as people live longer, retire later and maintain higher levels of physical and mental health into their older years.
A study published Monday suggests that people in their mid-60s believe old age starts at 75 — but the older people get, the later they think it begins.
The research, published in the American Psychological Association’s Psychology and Aging journal, examined data from around 14,000 participants in the German Aging Survey, which studies old age as a stage of life in Germany. The participants were born between 1911 and 1974 and entered the survey at ages 40 to 85.
The people studied reported their perceptions of old age up to eight times over 25 years. For every four to five years that passed, participants reported that old age started a year later compared to their last assessment.
https://www.nbcnews.com/health/aging/ho ... rcna148619
Re: Society & Demographics News and Discussions
US fertility rate dropped to lowest in a century as births dipped in 2023
Published 12:01 AM EDT, Thu April 25, 2024
The fertility rate in the United States has been trending down for decades, and a new report shows that another drop in births in 2023 brought the rate down to the lowest it’s been in more than century.
There were about 3.6 million babies born in 2023, or 54.4 live births for every 1,000 females ages 15 to 44, according to provisional data from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Center for Health Statistics.
After a steep plunge in the first year of the Covid-19 pandemic, the fertility rate has fluctuated. But the 3% drop between 2022 and 2023 brought the rate just below the previous low from 2020, which was 56 births for every 1,000 women of reproductive age.
“We’ve certainly had larger declines in the past. But decline fits the general pattern,” said Dr. Brady Hamilton, a statistician with the National Center for Health Statistics and lead author of the new report.
The birth rate fell among most age groups between 2022 and 2023, the new report shows.
https://edition.cnn.com/2024/04/24/heal ... index.html
Published 12:01 AM EDT, Thu April 25, 2024
The fertility rate in the United States has been trending down for decades, and a new report shows that another drop in births in 2023 brought the rate down to the lowest it’s been in more than century.
There were about 3.6 million babies born in 2023, or 54.4 live births for every 1,000 females ages 15 to 44, according to provisional data from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Center for Health Statistics.
After a steep plunge in the first year of the Covid-19 pandemic, the fertility rate has fluctuated. But the 3% drop between 2022 and 2023 brought the rate just below the previous low from 2020, which was 56 births for every 1,000 women of reproductive age.
“We’ve certainly had larger declines in the past. But decline fits the general pattern,” said Dr. Brady Hamilton, a statistician with the National Center for Health Statistics and lead author of the new report.
The birth rate fell among most age groups between 2022 and 2023, the new report shows.
https://edition.cnn.com/2024/04/24/heal ... index.html
Re: Society & Demographics News and Discussions
A world with fewer children?
May 3, 2024
Introduction:
caltrek’s comment: I am one of those that feels that the world is overpopulated. So, a culturally driven decline in infertility is actually a good thing. Obviously, if taken to an extreme it can become a real problem. Even at more moderate levels, there are challenges posed as noted in the article such as care for the elderly.
The introduction of robots and further mechanization into the workforce can offer a partial answer.
For developed countries, relatively relaxed immigration standards can also be of help. Unfortunately, there often seems to be a backlash against the idea and practice of allowing for more immigration. It would seem that on the one hand you have declining birth rates brought on by “a pervasive sense of hopelessness stemming from increasing inequality, economic uncertainty, and social fragmentation.” On the other hand, you have a paranoid backlash that gives rise to replacement conspiracy theories. Thus, relying on immigration poses its own set of challenges.
May 3, 2024
Introduction:
Read more here: https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1043532(Eurekalert) In the 1992 dystopian novel “Children of Men,” later adapted to film, humanity faces the chilling reality of a world without children, a global infertility crisis that threatens to extinguish the species. While this apocalyptic vision might seem far-fetched, today's real world faces a quieter but equally alarming phenomenon: declining human fertility. This is not due to a sudden inability to reproduce but rather a collective, culturally driven decline in the desire to bring new life into the world.
In a paper published in Nature Mental Health, University of Pennsylvania neuroscientists Michael Platt and Peter Sterling posit that the underlying mechanism of these declines may be despair, not dissimilar to what the movie depicts: a pervasive sense of hopelessness stemming from increasing inequality, economic uncertainty, and social fragmentation.
The researchers outline how the laws of conservation biology warn that any species unable to maintain its population risks extinction, and in the U.S. birth rates have been dipping below replacement levels for 50 years. The implications of this are far-reaching, and without intervention the repercussions will resonate throughout economies, societies, and generations to come. To discuss further and learn more, Penn Today sat with Penn Integrates Knowledge Professor Platt.
How did you and Peter Sterling both become interested in examining the effects of despair in the context of population declines?
We're biologists, and when a biologist notices that species fertility has fallen well below replacement for many years—since 1973 in U.S. —there are two big questions.
1) How long will this continue because eventually it leads to population collapse and extinction? 2) Since the biological drive to produce offspring is normally so strong but in this case is superseded by a more powerful force, we wondered what is the cause of collapsing fertility.
caltrek’s comment: I am one of those that feels that the world is overpopulated. So, a culturally driven decline in infertility is actually a good thing. Obviously, if taken to an extreme it can become a real problem. Even at more moderate levels, there are challenges posed as noted in the article such as care for the elderly.
The introduction of robots and further mechanization into the workforce can offer a partial answer.
For developed countries, relatively relaxed immigration standards can also be of help. Unfortunately, there often seems to be a backlash against the idea and practice of allowing for more immigration. It would seem that on the one hand you have declining birth rates brought on by “a pervasive sense of hopelessness stemming from increasing inequality, economic uncertainty, and social fragmentation.” On the other hand, you have a paranoid backlash that gives rise to replacement conspiracy theories. Thus, relying on immigration poses its own set of challenges.
Don't mourn, organize.
-Joe Hill
-Joe Hill
-
firestar464
- Posts: 7202
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2022 7:45 am
Re: Society & Demographics News and Discussions
I don't think we're overpopulated, just suffering from very serious geographical and class inequality.
Seriously though, I think the future simply involves feeling the AGI and automating stuff. Might not be a pleasant idea for some, but it's the solution society's heading for.
Seriously though, I think the future simply involves feeling the AGI and automating stuff. Might not be a pleasant idea for some, but it's the solution society's heading for.
-
weatheriscool
- Posts: 24482
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 6:16 pm
- Contact:
- Powers
- Posts: 1183
- Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2023 7:32 pm
- Location: a.k.a Lurking, Member, Lorem Ipsum, ..., --- and ººº.
Re: Society & Demographics News and Discussions
Damn.since
-
weatheriscool
- Posts: 24482
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 6:16 pm
- Contact:
Re: Society & Demographics News and Discussions
Needs to rebuild the family and make womb transplants for males possible = rebuild their population.
-
firestar464
- Posts: 7202
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2022 7:45 am
- Powers
- Posts: 1183
- Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2023 7:32 pm
- Location: a.k.a Lurking, Member, Lorem Ipsum, ..., --- and ººº.
Re: Society & Demographics News and Discussions
Distractions from having children?
- Time_Traveller
- Posts: 3025
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 4:49 pm
- Location: New York City, USA, November 5th 2032 C.E.
Re: Society & Demographics News and Discussions
Chinese university announces marriage-related degree in effort to boost declining birth rate
Latest bizarre effort to improve Chinese birth rates.
https://www.independent.co.uk/asia/chin ... 90158.html7 hours ago
China’s Civil Affairs University has announced a new marriage programme to promote and develop marriage-related culture, as the country renews efforts to rebuild falling birth rates.
The undergraduate programme, set to open in the Beijing institution this September, seeks to “cultivate professionals to develop marriage related industries and culture”, according to state media.
A fall in birth rates has prompted a population decrease in China for the second consecutive year, with marriage rates believed to be closely linked to increased births.
This decline comes despite China lifting its one-child policy in 2016 to allow couples to have a second child, before increasing it to three in 2021.
In 2022 marriages in China hit a record low after a downward trend lasting almost a decade, while 2023 saw the birth rate drop dramatically to half of the 2016 rate.
Latest bizarre effort to improve Chinese birth rates.
“In the quantum multiverse, every choice, every decision you've ever and never made exists in an unimaginably vast ensemble of parallel universes.”
-
weatheriscool
- Posts: 24482
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 6:16 pm
- Contact:
Re: Society & Demographics News and Discussions
china needs to develop womb transplants for young men. This way both sexes can have babies and that would seriously increase the population. The chinese could subside the surgery and pay any couple to take turns having babies.Time_Traveller wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 9:13 pm Chinese university announces marriage-related degree in effort to boost declining birth rate
https://www.independent.co.uk/asia/chin ... 90158.html7 hours ago
China’s Civil Affairs University has announced a new marriage programme to promote and develop marriage-related culture, as the country renews efforts to rebuild falling birth rates.
The undergraduate programme, set to open in the Beijing institution this September, seeks to “cultivate professionals to develop marriage related industries and culture”, according to state media.
A fall in birth rates has prompted a population decrease in China for the second consecutive year, with marriage rates believed to be closely linked to increased births.
This decline comes despite China lifting its one-child policy in 2016 to allow couples to have a second child, before increasing it to three in 2021.
In 2022 marriages in China hit a record low after a downward trend lasting almost a decade, while 2023 saw the birth rate drop dramatically to half of the 2016 rate.
Latest bizarre effort to improve Chinese birth rates.
Seriously, a man could get paid 25k per year extra for doing this and a woman 5k extra for each baby.
-
weatheriscool
- Posts: 24482
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 6:16 pm
- Contact:
Re: Society & Demographics News and Discussions
also consider the reality that woman don't want to have more kids and this would seriously hurt their careers if expected to have all these kids alone. It would be fair for men to take part in it and form a system of support that takes the middle ground of work and having children.weatheriscool wrote: ↑Sat Aug 03, 2024 3:18 amchina needs to develop womb transplants for young men. This way both sexes can have babies and that would seriously increase the population. The chinese could subside the surgery and pay any couple to take turns having babies.Time_Traveller wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 9:13 pm Chinese university announces marriage-related degree in effort to boost declining birth rate
https://www.independent.co.uk/asia/chin ... 90158.html7 hours ago
China’s Civil Affairs University has announced a new marriage programme to promote and develop marriage-related culture, as the country renews efforts to rebuild falling birth rates.
The undergraduate programme, set to open in the Beijing institution this September, seeks to “cultivate professionals to develop marriage related industries and culture”, according to state media.
A fall in birth rates has prompted a population decrease in China for the second consecutive year, with marriage rates believed to be closely linked to increased births.
This decline comes despite China lifting its one-child policy in 2016 to allow couples to have a second child, before increasing it to three in 2021.
In 2022 marriages in China hit a record low after a downward trend lasting almost a decade, while 2023 saw the birth rate drop dramatically to half of the 2016 rate.
Latest bizarre effort to improve Chinese birth rates.
Seriously, a man could get paid 25k per year extra for doing this and a woman 5k extra for each baby.
Re: Society & Demographics News and Discussions
Gen Z swerves traditional broadcast TV as less than half tune in weekly
Published: 31 July 2024
For the first time, less than half of 16-24-year-olds are now watching broadcast TV in an average week, according to Ofcom’s annual study into the nation’s media habits.
Just 48% of young audiences tuned in in an average week last year, down from 76% in 2018. Children aged 4-15 are tuning out at a similar rate, with only 55% watching broadcast TV each week in 2023, compared to 81% in 2018. Overall, the weekly reach of traditional TV fell by a record amount in the last year.
The decline in weekly reach among middle-aged viewers (45-54s) also accelerated, falling from 89% to 84% in a single year. In contrast, there has been relatively little change among loyal older audiences aged 65+, with around 95% continuing to tune in to broadcast TV each week.
Younger audiences aged 16-24 aren’t just watching broadcast TV less frequently, they’re also watching for shorter periods at only 33 minutes each day – down 16% year on year. Of this, a mere 20 minutes is spent watching live TV.
In comparison, they’re spending three times as long each day (1 hour 33 minutes) watching video-sharing platforms such as TikTok and YouTube.
https://www.ofcom.org.uk/media-use-and- ... in-weekly/

Published: 31 July 2024
For the first time, less than half of 16-24-year-olds are now watching broadcast TV in an average week, according to Ofcom’s annual study into the nation’s media habits.
Just 48% of young audiences tuned in in an average week last year, down from 76% in 2018. Children aged 4-15 are tuning out at a similar rate, with only 55% watching broadcast TV each week in 2023, compared to 81% in 2018. Overall, the weekly reach of traditional TV fell by a record amount in the last year.
The decline in weekly reach among middle-aged viewers (45-54s) also accelerated, falling from 89% to 84% in a single year. In contrast, there has been relatively little change among loyal older audiences aged 65+, with around 95% continuing to tune in to broadcast TV each week.
Younger audiences aged 16-24 aren’t just watching broadcast TV less frequently, they’re also watching for shorter periods at only 33 minutes each day – down 16% year on year. Of this, a mere 20 minutes is spent watching live TV.
In comparison, they’re spending three times as long each day (1 hour 33 minutes) watching video-sharing platforms such as TikTok and YouTube.
https://www.ofcom.org.uk/media-use-and- ... in-weekly/

-
weatheriscool
- Posts: 24482
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 6:16 pm
- Contact:
Re: Society & Demographics News and Discussions
China would be better off losing 500 million people in future generations and having 600 million people with robotics an a.i. Higher quality of life.
Re: Society & Demographics News and Discussions
How Can Wealthy Nations Respond to the Baby Bust?
August 27, 2024
Introduction:
For a presentation of study results as published in Annual Review of Economics: https://www.annualreviews.org/content/j ... 23-013750
August 27, 2024
Introduction:
Read more of the Eurekalert article here: https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1055820(Eurekalert) In recent decades, fertility rates in high-income countries have steadily declined. A new study analyzed demographic trends, patterns, determinants, and consequences. The authors emphasize that despite the significant economic challenges posed by low fertility, a strategic and consistent policy response can effectively mitigate most adverse consequences.
Across all 38 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Member countries – spanning from North and South America to Europe and Asia-Pacific – the total fertility rate, which indicates the average number of children a woman is expected to have based on current age-specific fertility rates, has fallen. With the exception of Israel, the total fertility rate in 2019 is below the replacement rate of 2.1 children per woman.
Below-replacement fertility, leading to a shrinking population, is also a major issue for China, where the total fertility rate was 1.50 in 2019. It is also expected to become significant for India, other South and Southeast Asian countries, and many Latin American countries.
“Low fertility and its economic challenges will become a global trend in the coming years. While ecologically beneficial, shrinking populations raise concerns about sustaining economic growth and social security. Some policy discussions on this topic are confused and exaggerated – our analysis aims to clarify the debate by compiling recent research and evidence,” explains study coauthor Michael Kuhn, IIASA Economic Frontiers Program Director.
The study, published in Annual Review of Economics, shows that fertility decline can be attributed to a variety of factors. These include income and educational growth, shifts in social norms and behaviors, the evolution of family roles away from traditional insurance mechanisms for old age, and the uncertainties of a complex modern world. Biological factors may also play a role: recent research shows that over the past 50 years, human sperm counts appear to have fallen by more than 50% around the globe. These drivers often interact, and their impact varies greatly depending on the context. This variability suggests that in different regions, these factors may influence fertility trends differently or even in opposing directions.
For a presentation of study results as published in Annual Review of Economics: https://www.annualreviews.org/content/j ... 23-013750
Don't mourn, organize.
-Joe Hill
-Joe Hill
-
weatheriscool
- Posts: 24482
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 6:16 pm
- Contact:
-
firestar464
- Posts: 7202
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2022 7:45 am
Re: Society & Demographics News and Discussions
IDK mind finding a source from someone who isn't some twatter dude citing the New York Post?
Re: Society & Demographics News and Discussions
"Higher levels of health insurance coverage, household broadband Internet access, and household income in communities might play a role in reducing suicide rates."
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/73/wr/mm7337e1.htm
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/73/wr/mm7337e1.htm