Hypersonic & Supersonic Aviation News and Discussions

User avatar
wjfox
Site Admin
Posts: 8663
Joined: Sat May 15, 2021 6:09 pm
Location: London, UK
Contact:

Hypersonic & Supersonic Aviation News and Discussions

Post by wjfox »

Paywalled, but you get the gist of it here.

This is one of several similar articles I've seen over the last couple of years. China seems to be pouring truckloads of money into next-gen aviation, space planes, etc.

----------

China designs hypersonic jet bigger than Boeing 737 with wings like Concorde

14 Jul, 2021
  • Researchers used aerodynamic model that contributed to China’s latest space missions
  • Official timeline aims by 2035 to operate a fleet of hypersonic aircraft that can transport 10 passengers to anywhere on Earth within an hour
China is developing a hypersonic aircraft larger than a Boeing 737, according to a study by scientists involved in the nation’s Mars and moon missions.

At 45 metres (148 feet), the plane would be nearly a third longer than a 737-700, with two air-breathing engines mounted on top of its main body. The design has a pair of delta wings similar to those of the Concorde, but with tips pointing up.

Such a complex design can bring multiple aerodynamic challenges when the aircraft goes hypersonic, or faster than five times the speed of sound.

https://www.scmp.com/news/china/science ... s-concorde


Image
User avatar
wjfox
Site Admin
Posts: 8663
Joined: Sat May 15, 2021 6:09 pm
Location: London, UK
Contact:

Re: Hypersonic & Supersonic Aviation News and Discussions

Post by wjfox »

US Air Force, Venture Firms Make $60 Million Bet on Hypersonic Aircraft Startup

August 5, 2021 08:47 AM ET

The U.S. Air Force, along with a number of venture capital funds, are making a $60 million bet on a Georgia-based startup, hoping the company’s efforts to develop a hypersonic airliner will benefit the military.

The service entered a $60 million strategic financing arrangement with Hermeus on July 30; the contract was announced Aug. 5. The deal is believed to be one of the largest such agreements brokered by AFWERX, the Air Force office that works to get commercial tech into the military. The Air Force did not respond to multiple questions about the deal.

“[H]ypersonic aircraft and propulsion systems are truly game-changing, and will revolutionize how we travel, just as automobiles did in the last century,” Maj. Gen. Heather Pringle, the Air Force Research Laboratory commander, said in a statement. “We are excited to be part of this effort, and to help propel this important technology.”

Hermeus is building a reusable hypersonic plane, something that has never been done before; so far, all hypersonic test vehicles and weapons have been built for a single flight.

The Air Force deal will allow Hermeus to accelerate its own work on technology that is projected to ultimately allow it to build a Mach-5 passenger aircraft that could fly from New York to London in 90 minutes. Executives said the company’s research and testing could speed up the Pentagon’s own quest for reusable hypersonic vehicles.

Read more: https://www.defenseone.com/business/202 ... up/184306/


Image
User avatar
wjfox
Site Admin
Posts: 8663
Joined: Sat May 15, 2021 6:09 pm
Location: London, UK
Contact:

Re: Hypersonic & Supersonic Aviation News and Discussions

Post by wjfox »

User avatar
wjfox
Site Admin
Posts: 8663
Joined: Sat May 15, 2021 6:09 pm
Location: London, UK
Contact:

Re: Hypersonic & Supersonic Aviation News and Discussions

Post by wjfox »

Why a Mach 5 passenger plane is a crazy idea that might just work

Jacopo Prisco, CNN • Updated 16th October 2021

Almost two decades since Concorde retired, interest around supersonic travel has been picking up pace, and several super-fast planes are under development. Airlines seem interested: United has already committed itself to offering supersonic routes as early as 2029.

But what about hypersonic travel, which happens at speeds of Mach 5 -- five times the speed of sound -- and above? That would get an aircraft from New York to London in just 90 minutes, compared to about three hours for Concorde, and between six to seven hours for a regular passenger jet.

Is it even possible?

Hermeus, an Atlanta-based startup whose goal is to develop hypersonic aircraft, believes so. It's already testing a new type of engine it says will eventually be capable of reaching Mach 5 (over 3,000 mph). The engine is designed for a small, unmanned hypersonic aircraft Hermeus is currently creating for the US Air Force, but scaled to a bigger size, it will be able to power a passenger plane.

https://edition.cnn.com/travel/article/ ... index.html


Image
User avatar
wjfox
Site Admin
Posts: 8663
Joined: Sat May 15, 2021 6:09 pm
Location: London, UK
Contact:

Re: Hypersonic & Supersonic Aviation News and Discussions

Post by wjfox »

User avatar
wjfox
Site Admin
Posts: 8663
Joined: Sat May 15, 2021 6:09 pm
Location: London, UK
Contact:

Re: Hypersonic & Supersonic Aviation News and Discussions

Post by wjfox »

Hypersonic Plane From Venus Aerospace Will Travel to the Edge of Space

6/09/22 7:30PM

Earlier this week, Venus Aerospace, a Houston-based aeronautics startup, released renderings for Stargazer—an incredibly fast high-altitude vehicle it’s hoping to develop.

Venus Aerospace has been working on the hypersonic aircraft since 2020, according to a company press release, and it has raised $33 million to build the plane, of which $1 million came from government funding. Hypersonic refers to vehicles or missiles capable of traveling Mach 5 or faster, and Stargazer has the potential to reach Mach 9, or nine times the speed of sound. The vehicle is being designed to hold 12 passengers while it travels at an altitude of 170,000 feet (51.8 kilometers), the company said in an email.

Even though Venus Aerospace calls Stargazer a “spaceplane,” the vehicle won’t actually venture to space. The technical boundary of space is still about 30 miles (50 kilometers) higher than Stargazer’s maximum altitude, so the plane won’t travel to beyond the Kármán line—sort of like how space balloons don’t really enter space either. That said, passengers will still have quite the view, with the curvature of Earth being clearly visible.

The Stargazer is expected to get passengers from Tokyo to Los Angeles in an hour. Imagine that—you’d be able to gallivant around Shibuya Crossing and climb the Skytree for a few hours, only to be back home on the west coast before dinnertime. That’s definitely an improvement over the the 11-hour flight on a commercial aircraft.

Stargazer would take off using engines just like a conventional airplane, but then “transition to rockets once at altitude and away from [the] city,” Venus Aerospace CTO Andrew Duggleby said to me in an email. Stargazer’s first ground test isn’t expected to happen until 2025 at the earliest, and there would be “no less than five years of flight testing to ensure safety, reliability, and performance,” he added.

https://gizmodo.com/venus-aerospace-hyp ... 1849039397


User avatar
caltrek
Posts: 6474
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: Hypersonic & Supersonic Aviation News and Discussions

Post by caltrek »

Before we get too wrapped up in the hype and romance of hypersonic transport, we need to remember that there may be some very real downsides.

Specifically:
The effects of emissions on stratospheric ozone from a hypersonic airplane flying at about 100,000 ft. altitude have not been fully evaluated by the atmospheric science community. NOx emissions are expected to lead to some level of ozone depletion, but the amount will depend on cruise altitude, the quantity of NOx ­emitted from engines, and fleet fuel use. Water vapor emissions from a hypersonic airplane will accumulate in the stratosphere, potentially affecting ozone as well. Moreover, CO2 and water vapor emissions are both greenhouse gases, but the climate effects of these emissions in the stratosphere have yet to be evaluated.
The effect on CO2 emissions is a little more complicated:
Lifetime CO2 emissions for a hypersonic airplane are a strong function of the amount of fuel burned and a weaker function (<1 percent) of the energy and ­materials used to fabricate, assemble, maintain, and dispose of the airplane. How the fuel is created can make a large difference as well. Fortunately, biofuel versions of hydrocarbon fuels can provide significant environmental benefits because CO2-absorbing biomass is used as feedstock to create the fuel. It is expected that this fuel would reduce lifecycle CO2 emissions by up to 70 percent.

Using current performance assumptions, calculations show that CO2 emissions per passenger mile for a hypersonic airliner will be comparable to those of a super­sonic airliner, but still much higher than for a conventional subsonic transport because of the increased fuel use needed to fly at supersonic or hypersonic speed. However, a passenger on a hypersonic airliner using 100 percent biofuel will have a comparable CO2 footprint per passenger mile to someone flying first class in a subsonic airliner that uses conventional Jet A fuel. While it is true that using 100 percent biofuel on conventional subsonic aircraft would give it a CO2 advantage, the relatively small fraction of passengers anticipated to fly on hypersonic airliners will largely mitigate the effects of this difference.

Biofuels are more expensive than traditional ­petroleum-based fuels, especially in the relatively small quantities now produced (<1 percent of current jet fuel supply). This actually presents an opportunity for supersonic and hypersonic airplanes as their passengers are less likely to be sensitive to ticket price, hence fuel price. In other words, they would be more likely to pay an additional premium to travel in a more eco-friendly manner, and in so doing spur the demand for biofuel, driving down the cost for all users. Existing aircraft, with legacy fuel and engine systems, are generally limited to 50 percent biofuel blends; new aircraft, such as a hypersonic transport with new or modified engines, can be designed to use 100 percent biofuels.
Source: https://www.nae.edu/19579/19582/21020/2 ... nic-Flight

As the cited article points out, there are also nuisance problems brought on by sonic booms. This might restrict high speed travel to over ocean routes and to relatively unpopulated land areas. That would, in turn, effect the economics of scaling up from experimental stages of development. The one percent elites might not mind the cost differentials, but the bulk of the traveling public might not find the saved time all that worth while.
Don't mourn, organize.

-Joe Hill
User avatar
wjfox
Site Admin
Posts: 8663
Joined: Sat May 15, 2021 6:09 pm
Location: London, UK
Contact:

Re: Hypersonic & Supersonic Aviation News and Discussions

Post by wjfox »

User avatar
wjfox
Site Admin
Posts: 8663
Joined: Sat May 15, 2021 6:09 pm
Location: London, UK
Contact:

Re: Hypersonic & Supersonic Aviation News and Discussions

Post by wjfox »

It's a bit quick...

User avatar
wjfox
Site Admin
Posts: 8663
Joined: Sat May 15, 2021 6:09 pm
Location: London, UK
Contact:

Re: Hypersonic & Supersonic Aviation News and Discussions

Post by wjfox »

UK studies reusable hypersonic military jet technology

2 days ago

Aeroengineers are to investigate the potential of hypersonic technologies for use by British armed forces.

Russia, China and the US are all developing missiles that can travel through the atmosphere at many times the speed of sound, making them very difficult to track and shoot down.

The UK project, announced at the Farnborough Air Show, would look to develop a super-fast, uncrewed air vehicle that could deliver payloads at great distance and then return to be used again.

The team behind the venture includes Rolls-Royce, the RAF, the defence research agency DSTL and the Oxfordshire company Reaction Engines.

It's also got the backing of the UK's National Security Strategic Investment Fund.

The consortium has already begun its work and will aim to fly a demonstrator "well within this decade".

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-62218968


Image
Post Reply