Examples of appropriate, acceptable, decent apparels from years gone by:








well (un)fortunately they aren't dressing for you-they're dressing for themselves, sorry to say not everyone acquiesces to your standards of apparel, some people actually do like their bodies and feel relatively good in it; so if they're not hurting anyone physically i don't see much point to holding shame for them- taking a look at the images, i'm not entirely too surprised those are the images you picked in the first place- says enough on its own that a man had to decide what "his" woman would wear(or not wear) during those times or society's expectations of women in general.Not like these days. I don't like current "fashion" and exposing yourself indecently or wearing weird clothes. I don't understand why are people so eager these days to show their bodies instead of clothes (or even worse - to show their tattoos).
you kind of have to explain more as to why this is the case- if you're coming up with a strawman that states that "people want to normalize and accept morbid obesity" you're already coming at this from the wrong angle- it's more so a rejection of idealized body types considering a higher percentage of the female population struggles with body dysmorphia, eating disorders and self-image issues as a result of patriarchal attitudes and behaviors that place a higher emphasis on the ideal body type(thin, hourglass figure with wide hips and narrow waist).The whole "body positivity" movement is stupid, awful and nonsensical.
Your statement is objectively wrong. Opinions can be objectively wrong. Different cultures throughout history into the modern day have/has different subjective standards of beauty as clearly demonstrated not just by my post but by merely reading history or looking outside one's own cultural group in the modern day, this is not a matter of debate, it is a 2+2 of established anthropology. This subjective variance in cultural norms is itself an objective observation.Tadasuke wrote: ↑Wed Jun 07, 2023 4:38 pm I really hate the whole "body positivity" movement. It directly goes against my long held principles and beliefs.
I believe that beauty is objective. We ought to hide what is ugly and display, exhibit what is beautiful. Some people don't get that.
I understand that not everyone shares my ideas, beliefs and preferences. But I wish the future does turn out more pleasing to the eye than the present.
on some level you're not necessarily wrong, eurocentric beauty standards do seem to dominate most of the market here in the west and even influences social media to some extent, dictating(for lack of a better word) what people see as beautiful or ugly, concurrently i'm sure most queer folk can agree on certain individuals having good facial/body structures even if they're not specially attracted to them. so to expand on your statement, while beauty may be "objective", your attraction to certain features is "subjective".I believe that beauty is objective. We ought to hide what is ugly and display, exhibit what is beautiful.
which is why you have to define who's eyes, yours? mine? society's? not gonna lie and say that there isn't an baseline to be met(as can be indicated by those with pretty privilege or anyone unlucky enough to suffer from lookism; YouTuber Qoves Studio analyses this in some of their videos), but in certain cultures, be they eurocentric, east asian, south asian, afrocentric, etc you'll most likely suffer in some capacity as you may not have a beauty feature that's highly regarded in one of them- making you "ugly" in some capacity.I understand that not everyone shares my ideas, beliefs and preferences. But I wish the future does turn out more pleasing to the eye than the present.