erowind wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 10:16 pm
Ken_J wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 8:49 pm
nearly nobody is talking about it over here, and of the people who do know about it there's already some stigma of it being what happens when one engages in 'sinful' behaviour.
so I really don't have much hope for this getting any effort from anyone to prevent it becoming a much bigger problem.
I don't know how you can acknowledge stigma and in the same sentence post a disinformation pundit with a reactionary title. There is no scientific basis for the media attention on LGBTQ+ communities ...
And again, I agree with you that the government isn't going to do anything to stop this. What I don't understand is the need for a homophobic angle to make that statement. The reason "nearly nobody is talking about it over here" is because most people on this forum understand why the information as it is being presented is not constructive to a discussion about monkeypox.
You seem to have difficulty in understanding the difference between stating what the narrative is and advocating the narrative, and also seem to be struggling with the understanding of perception not matching facts.
It doesn't matter if you agree with it, that is literally what comes up as a look at monkey pox, without even searching for the term. It has a monopoly on the disease narrative right now.
Rightly or wrongly it informs thoughts and opinions on the topic to those that know nothing about it.
It is not the only source working this narrative.
The situation is, whether you like it or not, one in which the majority of the narrative reaching the public is that there is a new disease that is being spread in the gay male population being spread through hook up gatherings. You can complain all you want about it being the narrative, but that does not change the fact that it informs that indifferent at best and 'serves them right' at worst mentality that is ongoing and will be how this illness is percieved and handled at all levels of society.
Just have a solid look at the fact that Covid "doesn't hurt children and mainly will only be a threat to the elderly and disabled" was paraded out early on and informed so much of how society handled that crisis in the early days. To and how after years, there are still people convinced it was just a cold, or that it's okay to let elderly and disabled people die so long as it doesn't hurt their ability to get a mochachino and a manicure.
The playing off of this disease mirrors things like teen pregnancy, as something that happens to sinners who don't abstain and maintain purity standards. And it follows the path of dismissing HIV in the early days (although hopefully this will be far less lethal an not become chronic or recurring) based on it's perception as a homosexual only disease.
That's exactly how I see this playing out. and going forward I see two possible outcomes. 1) it spreads and the majority of people recover, and it burns out of the population with death and disability numbers low enough that nobody remembers this in a decade. 2) It spreads at a smouldering rate, and finds resivours in animal populations to become something like the measles outbreaks that have resulted from antivaxxers in the last decade. becoming something that is just another disease that sees outbreaks everywhere from time to time, but which straight white christian populations will continue to imagine doesn't happen to them and only happens to 'naughty people'.