Examples of appropriate, acceptable, decent apparels from years gone by:
















well (un)fortunately they aren't dressing for you-they're dressing for themselves, sorry to say not everyone acquiesces to your standards of apparel, some people actually do like their bodies and feel relatively good in it; so if they're not hurting anyone physically i don't see much point to holding shame for them- taking a look at the images, i'm not entirely too surprised those are the images you picked in the first place- says enough on its own that a man had to decide what "his" woman would wear(or not wear) during those times or society's expectations of women in general.Not like these days. I don't like current "fashion" and exposing yourself indecently or wearing weird clothes. I don't understand why are people so eager these days to show their bodies instead of clothes (or even worse - to show their tattoos).
you kind of have to explain more as to why this is the case- if you're coming up with a strawman that states that "people want to normalize and accept morbid obesity" you're already coming at this from the wrong angle- it's more so a rejection of idealized body types considering a higher percentage of the female population struggles with body dysmorphia, eating disorders and self-image issues as a result of patriarchal attitudes and behaviors that place a higher emphasis on the ideal body type(thin, hourglass figure with wide hips and narrow waist).The whole "body positivity" movement is stupid, awful and nonsensical.








on some level you're not necessarily wrong, eurocentric beauty standards do seem to dominate most of the market here in the west and even influences social media to some extent, dictating(for lack of a better word) what people see as beautiful or ugly, concurrently i'm sure most queer folk can agree on certain individuals having good facial/body structures even if they're not specially attracted to them. so to expand on your statement, while beauty may be "objective", your attraction to certain features is "subjective".I believe that beauty is objective. We ought to hide what is ugly and display, exhibit what is beautiful.
which is why you have to define who's eyes, yours? mine? society's? not gonna lie and say that there isn't an baseline to be met(as can be indicated by those with pretty privilege or anyone unlucky enough to suffer from lookism; YouTuber Qoves Studio analyses this in some of their videos), but in certain cultures, be they eurocentric, east asian, south asian, afrocentric, etc you'll most likely suffer in some capacity as you may not have a beauty feature that's highly regarded in one of them- making you "ugly" in some capacity.I understand that not everyone shares my ideas, beliefs and preferences. But I wish the future does turn out more pleasing to the eye than the present.
Looks like you're the one who's gonna lose out, not anyone else.Tadasuke wrote: ↑Sat Nov 04, 2023 3:54 pm If people in the future will look even uglier and weirder than they look today, then I will just never leave the house and do everything through the Internet. Simple as that. I am adamant in my stances and views since the 2000s. Even wrote down them many years ago. I was born to experience reality I thoroughly hate, and I am told to just accept that and be tolerant to nearly everything. How about no?
Probably fashion in the 2030s and 2040s will be more individualistic, even potentially sometimes using 3D printing or customized orders. These days people do wear different (sometimes expensive) clothes, dye their hair, do make-up, get tattoos and piercings. They don't look better because of that. Genetic engineering, medicine, proper fitness, healthy eating/drinking and cosmetic surgeries or treatments (like permanent hair removal) are the only ways to actually look better. Clothes are not you, you are not clothes. Or piercings, or tattoos. They are only additions. Accessories.
Pretty judgemental of modern fashion and people's appearances there - not surprising coming from you now though sadly. Why do you find people so ugly now? Is it still just that more people are overweight? I remember you going on about that before.
I got in touch with some buddies at DARPA, who obviously don't wanna be identified. They gave me access to their time machine, and I went 20 years into the future. Remembering this post, I uhhhh, wanted to see what people were wearing. I managed to snap a pic:


Trying to help make the world a bit less distasteful, repulsive, disgusting and detestable. So people like me would find life a bit more tolerable. Of course I know people won't really change their minds because of me. But I won't either because of them.firestar464 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 06, 2023 12:16 am Being a Jane Austen fan, I do love the dresses. Nevertheless why is assigning dresses to women any of your business?
I am not treating men and women unequally. Either both of them have compulsory dress codes or none of them have. I personally like school uniforms as well as work uniforms, as long as they aren't low-quality or ugly on purpose.firestar464 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 4:08 pm Why is your beef with their clothing, not just consumerism then?
Since you believe that women wearing anything other than a dress are "distasteful, repulsive, disgusting and detestable," your mindset is not too different from the Taliban mandating burqas. I can't help but feel you're being deliberately insufferable to women due to your personal life struggles.