January 26, 2024
Introduction:
Read more here: https://www.eurasiareview.com/26012024 ... analysis/(Eurasia Review) A deal that would free up $106 billion in foreign aid spending for Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan, while tightening rules on immigration that the White House and senators from both parties have worked on for months, is under threat to be torpedoed by former President Donald Trump.
Backed by voters who consider immigration the most important issue in the 2024 race, Trump won in the New Hampshire primary Tuesday after securing a victory in Iowa last week.
“We called it right — immigration is a big deal,” Trump said in his victory speech Tuesday. “We have millions of millions of people flowing into our country illegally. They come from prisons, and they come from mental institutions,” he added without providing details to back up his claims.
Trump has used inflammatory anti-immigration language on the campaign trail, including that immigrants are “poisoning the blood of our country.”
The victory is likely to embolden the front-runner for the Republican presidential nominee to use his popularity to influence lawmakers from his party to avoid a compromise on immigration.
caltrek’s comment: This is how Trump operates (not an actual literal quote, but for illustrative purposes): “If you want to solve a problem, then I must be the one in charge. If I am not the one in charge, then the problem will not get solved.”
The greater problem is that more than one faction can play that game. Socialist revolutionaries, for example, proceed along these exact same lines.
There are two possible justifications that solve the faction problem.
1) Might makes right, which is the essence of fascism and totalitarian Communism.
2) The assertion that Trump should rule by divine right. The Republicans are now in the process of saying this quiet part out loud, insisting that Trump is some sort of divinely appointed personage. That Biden or Niki Haley could just as easily make this same argument is ignored.
Thus, we come full circle. From the rejection of the king of England as our rightful ruler to the desire to establish what is essentially a new king. Alexander Hamilton wanted such a thing to happen. Hamilton pointed to George Washington as logical strong man leader. Jefferson and others stringently disagreed. On that score, Washington agreed with Jefferson and company.
Trump and his followers are thus reactionaries. They would drag us back to how we were ruled centuries ago. A time in which many of our modern technologies did not even exist. This, despite Trump’s demonstrated ignorance of scientific, environmental, and technological issues.
For those that disagree with justification number 2, see justification number 1.