Is today's hard scifi going to look this stupid in 50 years?

Audio-visual media relating to science, technology and the future
Post Reply
Jakob
Posts: 247
Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 6:12 pm

Is today's hard scifi going to look this stupid in 50 years?

Post by Jakob »

User avatar
Powers
Posts: 1183
Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2023 7:32 pm
Location: a.k.a Lurking, Member, Lorem Ipsum, ..., --- and ººº.

Re: Is today's hard scifi going to look this stupid in 50 years?

Post by Powers »

Jakob wrote: Wed Jun 05, 2024 2:41 pm
Definitively, but would be funny if it resurged later on the road as part of a so pronosticated "second renaissance".
Image
User avatar
Cyber_Rebel
Posts: 545
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2021 10:59 pm
Location: New Dystopios

Re: Is today's hard scifi going to look this stupid in 50 years?

Post by Cyber_Rebel »

Perhaps, in the sense that our "hard sci fi" is too conservative in some areas and not weird enough in others. Assuming that 50 years from now definitely looks radically different than present day...circa 2074, I think it's reasonable that something else close to this date like Cyberpunk 2077 will be seen as laughably archaic.
User avatar
Powers
Posts: 1183
Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2023 7:32 pm
Location: a.k.a Lurking, Member, Lorem Ipsum, ..., --- and ººº.

Re: Is today's hard scifi going to look this stupid in 50 years?

Post by Powers »

Cyber_Rebel wrote: Thu Jun 06, 2024 1:24 am I think it's reasonable that something else close to this date like Cyberpunk 2077 will be seen as laughably archaic.
It is already and inferior to the prequel imo.
Vakanai
Posts: 534
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2022 10:23 pm

Re: Is today's hard scifi going to look this stupid in 50 years?

Post by Vakanai »

Considering most "hard" sci-fi still revolves around 100% biological, non-genetically engineered, non-technologically augmented human beings? Yeah, it's going to look pretty stupid in my opinion. Even in 50 years some level of at least minimally invasive BCI for example is going to be common as is some small measure of genetic editing for babies, if only to reduce the occurrences of genetic diseases - this just on the super unreasonable conservative end of the estimates.
Post Reply