Dare I say the graphs validity looks suspicious to me, the slowest common definition of Moore's law involves doubling every 2 years, 5 doublings in a decade is 32 yet in the graph it looks like there is only a bit more than 10 times improvement a decade.
Am I interpreting this graph wrong and how long does it take for Moore's law to double according to that graph?
Edit after typing out my thought above I now think I understand the graph. As each square is 10 times more than the previous square when I see a square and a bit what is covered in the second square is basically multiplying the first square my brain didn't comprehend exponential growth properly.