Rocketry development and concepts

weatheriscool
Posts: 24494
Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 6:16 pm
Contact:

Re: Rocketry development and concepts

Post by weatheriscool »

weatheriscool
Posts: 24494
Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 6:16 pm
Contact:

Re: Rocketry development and concepts

Post by weatheriscool »

weatheriscool
Posts: 24494
Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 6:16 pm
Contact:

Re: Rocketry development and concepts

Post by weatheriscool »

weatheriscool
Posts: 24494
Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 6:16 pm
Contact:

Re: Rocketry development and concepts

Post by weatheriscool »

weatheriscool
Posts: 24494
Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 6:16 pm
Contact:

Re: Rocketry development and concepts

Post by weatheriscool »

Europe Proposes Starship Alternative With Wings and Mid-Air Recovery
The RLV C5 concept is smaller than Starship, but a lot cheaper and crucially, independent.
By Jon Martindale March 4, 2026
Starship might be running late, but it's still likely to be the most capable heavy-lift launch vehicle when it's ready. Europeans looking to develop an alternative that isn't governed by America or the whims of SpaceX's CEO have suggested a similar design could be made to deliver a new European-centric heavy-lift vehicle with similar reusable properties.

The RLV C5 design was proposed by researchers at the German Aerospace Center in a new paper published in Springer Nature, in which they analyze Starship and its capabilities from publicly available data. They confirm SpaceX's own numbers, which suggest it could currently take around 66 US tons to orbit in reusable mode, while future versions could allow for up to about 126 tons with all parts of the rocket recovered.
Image
https://www.extremetech.com/aerospace/e ... r-recovery
weatheriscool
Posts: 24494
Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 6:16 pm
Contact:

Re: Rocketry development and concepts

Post by weatheriscool »

MaiaSpace: Europe steps up in the race for reusable rockets
French start-up Maiaspace is working to develop Europe’s first reusable mini-launcher. This new generation of rockets represents a major challenge for European space autonomy, while the American company SpaceX has been imposing its standards of reusability and cost reduction for years.

MaiaSpace is assembling and testing Europe’s first reusable mini-launcher at its factory in Vernon, Normandy. Its project is currently the most advanced of its kind in Europe. The first flight is scheduled beginning of 2027. A subsidiary of ArianeGroup — the French industrial giant that manufactures Ariane heavy-lift launchers — MaiaSpace already has commercial contracts signed for several years.

Raphaël Chevrier, spokesperson for MaiaSpace, takes us to the workshop where full-scale prototypes of the Maia launcher are assembled.

The model of the first stage alone is around thirty metres long. It’s this first stage that can be recovered, similar to what Elon Musk’s Space X has already been doing for around ten years. With Maia, Europe is trying to catch up this delay.

Europe does not currently have the technology to recover a first stage vertically. So this will be the first time that a company incorporates these technologies and it’s potentially also the forerunner in technologies that could be implemented on heavier European launchers.
https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2026 ... le-rockets
weatheriscool
Posts: 24494
Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 6:16 pm
Contact:

Re: Rocketry development and concepts

Post by weatheriscool »

weatheriscool
Posts: 24494
Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 6:16 pm
Contact:

Re: Rocketry development and concepts

Post by weatheriscool »

weatheriscool
Posts: 24494
Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 6:16 pm
Contact:

Re: Rocketry development and concepts

Post by weatheriscool »

weatheriscool
Posts: 24494
Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 6:16 pm
Contact:

Re: Rocketry development and concepts

Post by weatheriscool »


User avatar
caltrek
Posts: 9280
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: Rocketry development and concepts

Post by caltrek »

As Rocket Launches Increase, They May Be Polluting the Skies
By Ramin Skibba
April 6, 2026

Introduction:
(Undark) ROCKET LAUNCHES used to be a rare occurrence. But with access to space proliferating, partly thanks to an abundance of commercial space companies, global launches have risen exponentially: In the last five years, they’ve nearly tripled. According to an analysis by SpaceNews, in 2025 alone, humans shot about 320 rockets into space.

All those rockets produce a fair amount pollution, from the sooty plumes that catapult them into orbit and beyond to derelict satellites that burn up upon reentry. Regulators have been monitoring and restricting other air pollutants especially since the 1970s, including the exhaust from cars and jet engines. Many researchers believe such regulations are overdue for rocket engines — especially because nobody really knows exactly how much damage those pollutants cause. “It might be another 10 years until we found how large the influences on the atmosphere actually are,” said Leonard Schulz, a geophysicist at the University of Braunschweig – Institute of Technology in Northern Germany. By that time, he added, the pollution could accumulate to the point that, you cannot easily reverse it.

Though space pollution is still small compared to the aviation industry, rocket exhaust may be gradually depleting Earth’s protective ozone layer, which is still recovering from the impacts of pollution from a class of chemicals called chlorofluorocarbons. (CFCs, as they are known, were once commonly used as coolant in refrigerators and air conditioners, among other uses, and were regulated in the late 1980s.) But with limited data and industry transparency, many unknowns and uncertainties persist, including the impacts of next-generation rocket fuels.

Compared to other sources of pollution, the effects of sending rockets into space and from space debris that comes back down from orbit “has been negligible,” said Christopher Maloney, an atmospheric scientist at the University of Colorado who works out of the Chemical Sciences Laboratory at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, or NOAA, with recent research on emissions from rockets and reentries. “But if you follow these trends, what is it going to look like?”
The article points out that some rockets may be worse than others. A factor that may ultimately affect "rocketry development."

Read more here: https://undark.org/2026/04/06/as-rocke ... the- skies
Don't mourn, organize.

-Joe Hill
weatheriscool
Posts: 24494
Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 6:16 pm
Contact:

Re: Rocketry development and concepts

Post by weatheriscool »

weatheriscool
Posts: 24494
Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 6:16 pm
Contact:

Re: Rocketry development and concepts

Post by weatheriscool »

weatheriscool
Posts: 24494
Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 6:16 pm
Contact:

Re: Rocketry development and concepts

Post by weatheriscool »

weatheriscool
Posts: 24494
Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 6:16 pm
Contact:

Re: Rocketry development and concepts

Post by weatheriscool »

weatheriscool
Posts: 24494
Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 6:16 pm
Contact:

Re: Rocketry development and concepts

Post by weatheriscool »

weatheriscool
Posts: 24494
Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 6:16 pm
Contact:

Re: Rocketry development and concepts

Post by weatheriscool »

weatheriscool
Posts: 24494
Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 6:16 pm
Contact:

Re: Rocketry development and concepts

Post by weatheriscool »

weatheriscool
Posts: 24494
Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 6:16 pm
Contact:

Re: Rocketry development and concepts

Post by weatheriscool »

Post Reply